§
In the Matter of N

5 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Norris

    300 U.S. 564 (1937)   Cited 82 times
    Concluding that perjury is not cured by a later truthful disclosure because "the oath administered to the witness calls on him freely to disclose the truth in the first instance and not to put the court and the parties to the disadvantage, hindrance, and delay of ultimately extracting the truth by cross-examination"

  2. Caha v. United States

    152 U.S. 211 (1894)   Cited 160 times
    Taking judicial notice of rules and regulations prescribed by interior department

  3. United States v. Smull

    236 U.S. 405 (1915)   Cited 40 times

    ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 598. Argued January 7, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. A charge of crime against the United States must have clear legislative basis. A charge of perjury may be based on § 125, Criminal Code, for knowingly swearing falsely to an affidavit required either expressly by Act of Congress or by an authorized regulation of the Land Department. When by valid regulation the Land Department requires an affidavit to be made before

  4. State v. Miller

    26 R.I. 282 (R.I. 1904)   Cited 12 times
    In State v. Miller, 26 R.I. 282, 285, 58 A. 882, 883 (1904), we said that the language of the statute is broad and comprehensive "* * * and clearly indicates the intent of the legislature to enlarge the scope of the crime of perjury, as it exists at common law, and to make any willfully false swearing in judicial proceedings perjury, regardless of the question of its materiality to the issue; that is, in effect, to make it a statutory offence."

  5. Section 231 - Civil disorders

    18 U.S.C. § 231   Cited 226 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Teaching or demonstrating to another the use, application, or making of any firearm or explosive or incendiary device "knowing or having reason to know or intending" that it will be unlawfully employed for use in, or in furtherance of, a civil disorder that may obstruct, delay, or adversely affect commerce