§

In the Matter of Montero

14 I&N Dec. 399 (B.I.A. 1973)
In the Matter of Montero

5 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 61,325 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officers must inform suspects that they have a right to remain silent, that anything they say may be used as evidence against them, and that they are entitled to the presence of an attorney, either retained or appointed, prior to the interrogation

  2. Santos v. U.S. Immigration and Nat. Serv

    421 F.2d 1303 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 2 times

    No. 23160. February 13, 1970. Norman Stiller (argued), of Faulkner, Sheehan Wiseman, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. David R. Urdan (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., I.N.S., San Francisco, Cal., John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen. of the U.S., Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before MADDEN, Judge of the United States Court of Claims; MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. Senior Judge, United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation

  3. Barrese v. Ryan

    203 F. Supp. 880 (D. Conn. 1962)   Cited 7 times
    Rejecting the Board's interpretation of this statute that "single scheme" must be equated with "one criminal episode"

  4. United States v. Day

    21 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1927)   Cited 19 times
    In Lesto v. Day, 21 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1927), the court concluded that in order for a visit abroad to be considered temporary, an immigrant must maintain a domicile in the United States and must show an intention to return to the United States in a short time.

  5. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable