§

In the Matter of Matelot

18 I&N Dec. 334 (B.I.A. 1982)
In the Matter of Matelot

12 Cited authorities

  1. Haitian Refugee Center v. Smith

    676 F.2d 1023 (5th Cir. 1982)   Cited 135 times
    Holding that INA did not preclude district court's jurisdiction over procedural due process challenge to asylum procedures

  2. McMullen v. Imm. Naturalization Serv

    658 F.2d 1312 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 86 times
    Noting that refugees fleeing political persecution are often limited in the evidence they can submit to support their claims

  3. Haitian Refugee Ctr. v. Civiletti

    503 F. Supp. 442 (S.D. Fla. 1980)   Cited 35 times

    No. 79-2086-Civ-JLK. July 2, 1980. Kurzban Kurzban, P.A., Ira J. Kurzban, Miami, Fla., for the Haitian Refugee Center and National Emergency Civil Liberties Foundation; Peter A. Schey and Timothy S. Barker, Los Angeles, Cal., National Center for Immigrants' Rights; Dale F. Swartz, Washington, D.C., Alien Rights Law Project of the Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law; Vera Weiss and Steven Forester, Miami, Fla., Haitian Refugee Center; Ira Golobin, New York City, National Council

  4. Stevic v. Sava

    678 F.2d 401 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 32 times
    In Stevic, the petitioner filed a motion to reopen his deportation proceedings based on a claim of persecution under section 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h).

  5. Rejaie v. Immigration Naturalization Service

    691 F.2d 139 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 25 times
    Equating "clear probability" with "well-founded fear"

  6. Kashani v. Imm. Nat. Service

    547 F.2d 376 (7th Cir. 1977)   Cited 21 times
    In Kashani v. INS, 547 F.2d 376 (7th Cir. 1977), we stated that under the "clear probability" standard, "objective evidence that the alien will be persecuted is necessary.

  7. Conceiro v. Marks

    360 F. Supp. 454 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)   Cited 4 times
    In Conceiro v. Marks, 360 F. Supp. 454 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) (Wyatt, J.), habeas corpus relief was denied because the court could find no abuse of discretion in the district director's denial of parole to an excludable political asylum applicant.

  8. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,904 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  9. Section 1253 - Penalties related to removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1253   Cited 1,132 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Establishing an exception to withholding for a dangerous alien who has been convicted of a "particularly serious crime," defined to include an "aggravated felony"

  10. Section 208.7 - Employment authorization

    8 C.F.R. § 208.7   Cited 70 times
    Providing that "the [employment authorization] application shall be submitted no earlier than 150 days after the date on which a complete asylum application submitted in accordance with §§ 208.3 and 208.4 has been received"

  11. Section 208.10 - Failure to appear at an interview before an asylum officer or failure to follow requirements for fingerprint processing

    8 C.F.R. § 208.10   Cited 45 times
    Requiring the applicant to demonstrate "exceptional circumstances" to excuse her failure to appear

  12. Section 208.5 - Special duties toward aliens in custody of DHS

    8 C.F.R. § 208.5   Cited 42 times

    (a)General. When an alien in the custody of DHS requests asylum or withholding of removal, or expresses a fear of persecution or harm upon return to his or her country of origin or to agents thereof, DHS shall make available the appropriate application forms and shall provide the applicant with the information required by section 208(d)(4) of the Act, including in the case of an alien who is in custody with a positive credible fear or reasonable fear determination under 8 CFR 208.30 or 208.31 , and