§

In the Matter of Martinez-Solis

14 I&N Dec. 93 (B.I.A. 1972)
In the Matter of Martinez-Solis

10 Cited authorities

  1. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 753 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"

  2. United States v. Ramos

    413 F.2d 743 (1st Cir. 1969)   Cited 18 times
    Holding suggestions "by trial judges to prosecutors concerning elements of proof and appropriate lines of inquiry have often been held proper, even when made in the presence of the jury"

  3. Wood v. Hoy

    266 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1959)   Cited 28 times
    In Wood, we rejected the BIA’s interpretation as "not what the statute says" because the BIA "applied the statute as if it read ‘single criminal act’ " rather than "single scheme of criminal misconduct."

  4. Tejeda v. U.S. Immigration Nat. Serv

    346 F.2d 389 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    No. 18999. May 19, 1965. William C. Wunsch, Faulkner, Sheehan Wiseman, Norman Stiller, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., Charles Elmer Collett, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before POPE and BARNES, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge. BARNES, Circuit Judge: This is a petition to review a final order of deportation. Jurisdiction lies with this court under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a and 5 U.S.C. § 1031-1042; Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization

  5. Estate of Smith

    33 Cal.2d 279 (Cal. 1949)   Cited 27 times

    Docket No. S.F. 17406. January 11, 1949. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco decreeing distribution of an estate. T.I. Fitzpatrick, Judge. Affirmed. Jay A. Darwin and Clifton E. Brooks for Appellant. Weinmann, Moffitt Quayle and Cyril Viadro for Respondent. TRAYNOR, J. Lewis Warren Smith died on May 28, 1945, leaving a holographic will dated April 7, 1942. By his will he bequeathed "to my wife the sum of Five Dollars" and $500 to the widows' and orphans'

  6. Spradlin v. United States

    284 F. Supp. 763 (D. Mont. 1968)

    No. 2639. April 29, 1968. Rapcoch McKinney, Lewistown, Mont., for plaintiff. Robert T. O'Leary, Asst. U.S. Atty., Butte, Mont., for defendants. OPINION AND ORDER RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge. In an opinion and order dated January 11, 1967, 262 F. Supp. 502 the court remanded this case to the Secretary for further proceedings in conformity with the court's opinion. The court found the Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration, had not properly applied the presumption created by R.C

  7. Field v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    313 F.2d 743 (3d Cir. 1963)

    No. 14010. Argued November 5, 1962. Decided February 19, 1963. A. Harry Levitan, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner. Joseph R. Ritchie, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., for respondent. Before GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and AUGELLI, District Judge. PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court on motion of the Immigration and Naturalization Service to remand the case to the Service for further proceedings and to dismiss the petition for judicial review filed herein. The record discloses that petitioner,

  8. Goff v. Goff

    52 Cal.App.2d 23 (Cal. Ct. App. 1942)   Cited 18 times

    Docket No. 13590. May 8, 1942. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Carl A. Stutsman, Judge. Affirmed. P.E. Durkee for Appellant. George Appell and Harry A. Mock for Respondent. WHITE, J. Appeal by defendant and cross-complainant in an action for annulment of a marriage, wherein the court ordered judgment of annulment in favor of plaintiff and cross-defendant. Epitomizing the facts, it appears from the record that on or about September 7, 1935, the parties hereto, after

  9. Tandaric v. Robinson

    257 F.2d 895 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 2 times

    No. 12238. August 12, 1958. Rehearing Denied September 3, 1958. Arthur A. Daronatsy, Gary, Ind., for appellant. Robert Tieken, U.S. Atty., Charles R. Purcell, Jr., and John Peter Lulinski, Asst. U.S. Attys., Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for appellee. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, and FINNEGAN and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of the district court sustaining an order for his deportation and dismissing his complaint in an action filed

  10. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable