§

In the Matter of Marques

15 I&N Dec. 200 (B.I.A. 1975)
In the Matter of Marques

7 Cited authorities

  1. Griffin v. California

    380 U.S. 609 (1965)   Cited 4,900 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prosecutor may not comment on a defendant's failure to testify

  2. Malloy v. Hogan

    378 U.S. 1 (1964)   Cited 3,147 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a witness properly invoked the Fifth Amendment to refuse to answer questions about associates at the time of a prior gambling arrest, despite the expiration of the statute of limitations, because such disclosure “might furnish a link in a chain of evidence sufficient to connect the petitioner with a more recent crime”

  3. Spevack v. Klein

    385 U.S. 511 (1967)   Cited 630 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the privilege protects a lawyer who refuses to give testimony that might incriminate himself

  4. Hintopoulos v. Shaughnessy

    353 U.S. 72 (1957)   Cited 105 times
    Holding that where Congress fails to specify standards to guide the Attorney General's discretion in immigration, the Attorney General may rely on any reasonable factors

  5. Kimm v. Rosenberg

    363 U.S. 405 (1960)   Cited 19 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 139. Argued May 16-17, 1960. Decided June 13, 1960. Petitioner, an alien whose deportation had been ordered, applied under § 19(c) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended, for an order suspending his deportation or permitting his voluntary departure. In an administrative hearing on his application, he was asked whether he was a member of the Communist Party. He refused to answer, claiming the Fifth Amendment privilege

  6. Valeros v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    387 F.2d 921 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16087. November 28, 1967. Samuel D. Myers, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Edward V. Hanrahan, U.S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before KNOCH, KILEY and FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judges. KILEY, Circuit Judge. A Special Inquiry Officer of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (Service) found petitioner subject to deportation, granted her the privilege of voluntary departure, but ordered her deported should she not depart voluntarily. The Board of Immigration Appeals

  7. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,160 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable