13 Cited authorities
Spevack v. Klein
385 U.S. 511 (1967) Cited 630 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that the privilege protects a lawyer who refuses to give testimony that might incriminate himself
Jay v. Boyd
351 U.S. 345 (1956) Cited 205 timesFinding that suspension of deportation "is manifestly not a matter of right under any circumstances, but rather is in all cases a matter of grace"
Hintopoulos v. Shaughnessy
353 U.S. 72 (1957) Cited 104 timesHolding that where Congress fails to specify standards to guide the Attorney General's discretion in immigration, the Attorney General may rely on any reasonable factors
Kimm v. Rosenberg
363 U.S. 405 (1960) Cited 19 timesCERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 139. Argued May 16-17, 1960. Decided June 13, 1960. Petitioner, an alien whose deportation had been ordered, applied under § 19(c) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended, for an order suspending his deportation or permitting his voluntary departure. In an administrative hearing on his application, he was asked whether he was a member of the Communist Party. He refused to answer, claiming the Fifth Amendment privilege
United States v. Shaughnessy
180 F.2d 489 (2d Cir. 1950) Cited 73 timesIn United States ex rel. Kaloudis v. Shaughnessy, 180 F.2d 489 (2d Cir. 1950), the court affirmed a district court's refusal to grant an alien a hearing to review whether the Attorney General had abused his discretion in failing to suspend a deportation order.
Jarecha v. Immigration Naturalization Serv
417 F.2d 220 (5th Cir. 1969) Cited 35 timesNo. 27375 Summary Calendar. September 5, 1969. Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied October 21, 1969. Morris Brown, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant. Troy A. Adams, Jr., District Director, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, New Orleans, La., District Director, U.S. Immigration Naturalization Service, Atlanta, Ga., John W. Stokes, Jr., U.S. Atty., Beverly B. Bates, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Horace P. Rowley, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., John Mitchell, Atty. Gen. of
Jimenez v. Barber
252 F.2d 550 (9th Cir. 1958) Cited 32 timesSuggesting that a district court should grant an order prohibiting deportation "until the Board could act upon [the alien's motion to reopen]" where there is a "substantial question" as to deportability
DE LUCIA v. IMMIGRATION NATURALIZATION SERV
370 F.2d 305 (7th Cir. 1967) Cited 18 timesNo. 15661. November 17, 1966. Certiorari Denied February 13, 1967. See 87 S.Ct. 861. Jack Wasserman, Washington, D.C., Joseph I. Bulger, Chicago, Ill., David Carliner, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Edward V. Hanrahan, U.S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, KNOCH and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges. SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, Paul De Lucia, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying discretionary
Chen v. Foley
385 F.2d 929 (6th Cir. 1967) Cited 17 timesRecognizing the Board of Immigration Appeals has "consistently held that a preconceived intent to establish permanent residence via the nonimmigrant route . . . is a factor to be considered in denying relief under Section 245" and applying the doctrine where there was "doubt as to the bona fides of the respondent's entry as a nonimmigrant visitor for pleasure"
Thomaidis v. Immigration Serv
431 F.2d 711 (9th Cir. 1970) Cited 5 timesNo. 24208. September 18, 1970. Joseph S. Hertogs (argued), Jackson Hertogs, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners. David R. Urdan (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., James L. Browning, U.S. Atty., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., I.N.S., San Francisco, Cal., John Mitchell, Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge. The Honorable Charles L. Powell, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation
Section 1251 - Transferred
8 U.S.C. § 1251 Cited 2,159 times 1 Legal AnalysesDelineating crimes that make alien deportable