§
In the Matter of M

18 Cited authorities

  1. Williamson v. Osenton

    232 U.S. 619 (1914)   Cited 341 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may gain access to federal court by changing his domicile even though the party changed his domicile solely out of a desire to sue in federal court

  2. Matter of Newcomb

    192 N.Y. 238 (N.Y. 1908)   Cited 298 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that a person may have only one domicile

  3. White v. White

    138 Conn. 1 (Conn. 1951)   Cited 34 times
    In White v. White, 138 Conn. 1, 81 A.2d 450, a wife left her husband, taking their child with her. The court found that the husband was not at fault and that he continued to have living quarters available for the child.

  4. Rice v. Rice

    134 Conn. 440 (Conn. 1948)   Cited 38 times

    The plaintiff and her husband R were domiciled in Connecticut. He went to Reno and obtained a divorce by a proceeding in which she entered no appearance, married the defendant H there and went with H to California, where he died. Domicil on the part of R was a necessary condition precedent to the jurisdiction of the Nevada court. This jurisdictional fact, which essentially involves the good faith of R in taking up his residence in Reno, is a proper subject for re-examination by the courts of this

  5. Samson v. Bergin

    84 A.2d 273 (Conn. 1951)   Cited 32 times

    A nonresident upon whom service has not been made within the state may submit to jurisdiction by consent by voluntarily entering a general appearance. The judgment of a court without jurisdiction is a nullity. Such a judgment, whenever and wherever declared upon as a source of a right may always be challenged. This does not offend the full faith and credit clause of the federal constitution, nor does it violate the principles of comity. A board of arbitrators, appointed pursuant to the provisions

  6. In re Dorrance

    115 N.J. Eq. 268 (N.J. 1934)   Cited 42 times
    Affirming Dorrance v. Martin [Sup.Ct.1935] 176 A. 902, 13 N.J.Misc. 168, Per Curiam, affirmed [Err. & App. 1936] 116 N.J.Law, 362, 184 A. 743; Per Curiam on Per Curiam opinion of Supreme Court

  7. Mills v. Mills

    179 A. 5 (Conn. 1935)   Cited 36 times

    To constitute domicil, the residence at the place chosen for the domicil must be actual, and to the fact of residence there must be added the intention of remaining permanently; and that place is the domicil of the person in which he has voluntarily fixed his habitation, not for a mere temporary or special purpose, but with the present intention of making it his home, unless or until something which is uncertain or unexpected shall happen to induce him to adopt some other permanent home. When a person

  8. Melillo v. Melillo

    18 Conn. Supp. 397 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1953)   Cited 1 times

    File No. J 4324 The parties, husband and wife, were domiciled in Connecticut. The defendant husband went to Florida and obtained a divorce in a proceeding in which the plaintiff entered no appearance. He married a New Haven woman in Florida, and the couple remained there for several months, the defendant being employed. They then came "home" to New Haven. Domicil on the part of the defendant was a necessary condition precedent to the jurisdiction of the Florida court. This jurisdictional fact, which

  9. Torlonia v. Torlonia

    108 Conn. 292 (Conn. 1928)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that wife, in country on temporary nonimmigration visa, was domiciled in state despite "brief and temporary sojourns" to other areas of country for vacation

  10. Albert Tessier v. John J. Magee

    15 Conn. Supp. 342 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1948)   Cited 1 times

    File No. 69895 Defendant T, wife of the plaintiff, and the named defendant left Connecticut, their domicil, for Nevada, where they obtained divorces from their respective spouses and went through a marriage ceremony. They returned to Connecticut and have since resided here. The plaintiff did not appear in the divorce action brought by his wife and was not served with process within Nevada. In an action for a declaratory judgment, held that at no time did the defendants establish a domicil in Nevada

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,436 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status