§
In the Matter of M

3 Cited authorities

  1. Matter of Willis

    94 Misc. 29 (N.Y. Misc. 1916)   Cited 11 times

    February, 1916. Charles P. Hallock, for executor. Morris Schector, Deputy Attorney-General, for claimant. Thomas M. Simonton, for legatee. Louis A. Moskowitz, special guardian for incompetent. SCHULZ, S. This proceeding is brought for the judicial settlement of the account of the executor of the last will and testament of the decedent. The latter left her surviving two sons and one daughter, and the gross amount of her estate at the time of her death was $4,990.40. It appears uncontradicted that

  2. Matter of Cross

    99 Misc. 199 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1917)   Cited 10 times
    In Matter of Cross (99 Misc. 199) the court held that the claim of Binghamton State Hospital against the estate of a decedent for the care of her husband had been waived by failure of the claimant to make any claim against the decedent in her lifetime.

  3. Matter of Popoff

    10 Misc. 272 (N.Y. Misc. 1894)

    November, 1894. Sidney V. Lowell, for appellant. Albert G. McDonald, for respondent. CLEMENT, Ch. J. By section 10 of title X of the revised charter of this city (Laws of 1888, p. 995) the board of assessors have power to rectify any error in an assessment for a local improvement only in five cases, and the facts now before us do not come under either of such cases. The error of the assessors (if there was error) was not clerical, as in the case of People ex rel. Nostrand v. Wilson, 119 N.Y. 515