§
In the Matter of M

4 Cited authorities

  1. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy

    342 U.S. 580 (1952)   Cited 563 times
    Holding that the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to deportation orders because "[d]eportation, however severe its consequences, has been consistently classified as a civil rather than a criminal procedure"

  2. Caminetti v. United States

    242 U.S. 470 (1917)   Cited 1,909 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that importation of a woman for immoral purposes may constitutionally be regulated even when it is not for material gain

  3. Mahler v. Eby

    264 U.S. 32 (1924)   Cited 230 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government failed to comply "with all the statutory requirements"

  4. United States v. Ahrens

    113 F. Supp. 22 (E.D. La. 1953)   Cited 7 times

    Misc. No. 854. June 8, 1953. William C. Orchard, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. John N. McKay, U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for respondent. WRIGHT, District Judge. This habeas corpus proceeding was brought to test the validity of an order of deportation issued pursuant to the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. Relator attacks the constitutionality of section 242(b) of that act on the ground that the deportation procedure provided therein denied him due process of law in