ยง
In the Matter of M

5 Cited authorities

  1. In re Post

    819 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. 2012)

    Docket No. 145532. 2012-08-20 In the Matter Of Honorable Kenneth D. POST, 58th District Court. Before the Judicial Tenure Commission. Order On order of the Court, the request by the Judicial Tenure Commission for appointment of a master is considered and Honorable A. John Pikkarainen is appointed Master to hear Formal Complaint No. 90.

  2. Benson v. McMahon

    127 U.S. 457 (1888)   Cited 98 times
    In Benson, the Supreme Court stated that an extradition hearing is a limited affair akin to a preliminary hearing to determine whether to hold an accused to answer for the commission of a crime.

  3. People v. Miller

    143 A.D. 251 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)   Cited 34 times

    March 17, 1911. Robert S. Johnstone, for the appellant. Lorlys Elton Rogers, for the respondent. SCOTT, J.: Appeal by the People of the State of New York from an order of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in and for the county of New York, arresting a judgment of conviction of the above-named defendant of the crime of unlawfully entering a building with intent to commit a larceny therein. The defendant was indicted for the crimes of burglary in the third degree, grand larceny and receiving

  4. In re Rust

    181 Cal. 73 (Cal. 1919)   Cited 16 times

    Crim. No. 2242. August 25, 1919. APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus originally made to the Supreme Court. Petitioner remanded. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Chas. F. Hanlon for Petitioner. Oliver Dibble and John T. Williams for Respondent. WILBUR, J. Petitioner, being held under a commitment from the police court, seeks his release from the custody of the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco. He is licensed to practice osteopathy. His license was issued March 6

  5. The People v. Larned

    7 N.Y. 445 (N.Y. 1852)   Cited 5 times

    December Term, 1852 John V.L. Pruyn, for the plaintiff in error. E. Brown, for defendant in error. RUGGLES, Ch. J., delivered the opinion of the court. There was no error in impaneling the jury. The statute (2 R.S. 420, ยง 61) directs that "The twelve first persons who shall appear as their names are drawn and called, and shall be approved as indifferent between the parties shall be sworn and shall be the jury to try the issue. And section 67 directs that if any juror be absent at the time his name