In the Matter of Luna

5 Cited authorities

  1. Williams v. North Carolina

    325 U.S. 226 (1945)   Cited 900 times
    Holding that to accord absolute verity to jurisdictional recitations "would give one State a control over all the other States which the Full Faith and Credit Clause certainly did not confer"
  2. Williams v. North Carolina

    317 U.S. 287 (1942)   Cited 801 times
    Holding that a state has subject matter jurisdiction to grant a divorce if one of the spouses is domiciled in the state
  3. Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel

    16 N.Y.2d 64 (N.Y. 1965)   Cited 77 times
    In Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel, 1965, 16 N.Y.2d 64, 262 N.Y.S.2d 86, 209 N.E.2d 709, 13 A.L.R.3d 1401, cert. den. 384 U.S. 971, 86 S.Ct. 1861, 16 L.Ed.2d 682, the Court of Appeals of New York was presented with the question whether such a bilateral divorce granted in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico, was entitled to recognition in New York State.
  4. Sorensen v. Sorensen

    219 App. Div. 344 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)   Cited 7 times

    February 4, 1927. Appeal from Supreme Court of Kings County. William H. Good, for the appellant. Richmond J. Reese [ George C. Howard with him on the brief], for the respondent. KAPPER, J. The parties entered into a ceremonial marriage on May 25, 1900. In the month of February, 1901, a child was born of this marriage who is now living. Prior to said ceremonial marriage, defendant had intermarried with one Westerdahl, in Denmark. Westerdahl and the defendant were both natives of Denmark and were living

  5. Section 1153 - Allocation of immigrant visas

    8 U.S.C. § 1153   Cited 1,162 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Determining an applicant's age as " the age of the alien on the date on which an immigrant visa number becomes available for such alien . . . but only if the alien has sought to acquire the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence within one year of such availability; reduced by (B) the number of days in the period during which the applicable petition . . . was pending"