In the Matter of Linnas

16 Cited authorities

  1. Accardi v. Shaughnessy

    347 U.S. 260 (1954)   Cited 891 times
    Holding that Board of Immigration Appeals was required to follow its own regulations in deciding whether to suspend deportation
  2. McKeel v. Islamic Republic of Iran

    722 F.2d 582 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 70 times
    Holding in an analogous context that " United States embassy ... does not constitute territory of the United States"
  3. United States v. Shaughnessy

    218 F.2d 316 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 33 times
    In United States ex rel. Leong Choy Moon v. Shaughnessy, 218 F.2d 316, 318 (2 Cir. 1954), we stated that "In the field of immigration and nationality Congress has vested the executive branch of the Government with wide discretionary powers, and the scope of judicial review is closely circumscribed."
  4. United States v. Murff

    264 F.2d 926 (2d Cir. 1959)   Cited 23 times
    In United States ex rel. Tom Man v. Murff, 264 F.2d 926 (2d Cir. 1959), this court held that before an alien might be deported, the consent of the receiving country must be procured.
  5. Brice v. Pickett

    515 F.2d 153 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that due process does not require that an alien being deported for a foreign conviction be permitted to challenge the conviction collaterally
  6. United States v. Murff

    176 F. Supp. 253 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that alien paroled and released on bond pending exclusion proceedings was "still, in theory of law, ‘on the threshold of initial entry.’ " (quoting Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei , 345 U.S. 206, 212, 73 S.Ct. 625, 97 L.Ed. 956 (1953) )
  7. Rogers v. Cheng Fu Sheng

    280 F.2d 663 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 15 times
    Suggesting a "country" with the meaning of the statute requires a functioning government with undisputed control over a well-defined geographical area
  8. Cheng v. Immigration and Naturalization Ser

    521 F.2d 1351 (3d Cir. 1975)   Cited 1 times

    No. 74-2264. Argued June 24, 1975. Decided August 18, 1975. Certiorari Denied January 12, 1976. Jules E. Coven, Lebenkoff Coven, New York City, for petitioner. John L. Murphy, Chief, Government Regulations Section, Crim. Div., and Chester J. Halicki, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent. Petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before VAN DUSEN, ROSENN and WEIS, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: This Amended Petition for Review of a December 30, 1974

  9. Chan Chuen v. Esperdy

    285 F.2d 353 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 9 times
    In Chan Chuen, this Court held that for purposes of designating a country of deportation under former 8 U.S.C. § 1253(a), the term "country" as used in that statute encompassed Hong Kong (then, a British colony).
  10. Ying v. Kennedy

    292 F.2d 740 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 8 times

    No. 15696. Argued March 16, 1961. Decided April 27, 1961. Petition for Rehearing Denied June 2, 1961. Mr. David Carliner, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr.Jack Wasserman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Abbott A. Leban, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U.S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee. Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, and DANAHER, Circuit Judge. Sitting

  11. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,032 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  12. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable
  13. Section 1253 - Penalties related to removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1253   Cited 1,132 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Establishing an exception to withholding for a dangerous alien who has been convicted of a "particularly serious crime," defined to include an "aggravated felony"