§
In the Matter of Lin

24 Cited authorities

  1. Leng May Ma v. Barber

    357 U.S. 185 (1958)   Cited 209 times
    Holding that an alien's parole into the United States "did not alter her status as an excluded alien"

  2. Rogers v. Quan

    357 U.S. 193 (1958)   Cited 11 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 396. Argued May 20, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Respondents, natives of China, came to the United States between 1949 and 1954, seeking admission. All were paroled in the United States but have been ordered excluded. They applied for stays of deportation under § 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, on the ground that their deportation to China would subject them to physical persecution at the hands

  3. Vitale v. Immigration Naturalization Service

    463 F.2d 579 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that, for the period between inspection at the airport to alien's exclusion hearing, "[t]he placing of Vitale in the custody of Alitalia Airlines constituted parole; [so] he did not effect an entry into the United States"

  4. United States v. Vasilatos

    209 F.2d 195 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that a ship crewmember "entered" the country under § 1326 when his request for admission was decided, not when he merely crossed the border into the United States

  5. United States v. Murff

    176 F. Supp. 253 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that alien paroled and released on bond pending exclusion proceedings was "still, in theory of law, ‘on the threshold of initial entry.’ " (quoting Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei , 345 U.S. 206, 212, 73 S.Ct. 625, 97 L.Ed. 956 (1953) )

  6. Wong Hing Fun v. Esperdy

    335 F.2d 656 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 498, Docket 28587. Argued June 9, 1964. Decided August 20, 1964. Jules E. Coven, New York City (Lebenkoff Coven, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants. Roy Babitt, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Before MOORE, SMITH and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. MARSHALL, Circuit Judge: Appellants are natives of China who arrived in this country as crewmen on vessels putting in at United States

  7. United States v. Esperdy

    366 F.2d 266 (2d Cir. 1966)   Cited 9 times

    No. 396, Docket 30356. Argued June 1, 1966. Decided August 30, 1966. Anna M. Pappas, New York City (Pappas Pappas, New York City, on the brief), for appellant. Francis J. Lyons, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty. Southern District of New York (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., and James G. Greilsheimer, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty. Southern District of New York, on the brief), for appellee. Before MOORE, SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Grigorios Stellas appeals from an order of the United States

  8. Licea-Gomez v. Pilliod

    193 F. Supp. 577 (N.D. Ill. 1960)   Cited 12 times
    Stating that "a consul's decision to withhold a visa is not reviewable, not even by the Secretary of State"

  9. Bostick v. United States

    409 F.2d 5 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 4 times

    No. 24287. March 24, 1969. R.S. Carrigan, Houston, Tex., Michael Lowenberg, Dallas, Tex., for appellants. James R. Gough, Ronald Blask, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for appellee. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge and WISDOM, Circuit Judge, and BREWSTER, District Judge. ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM: The petition of the United States for a rehearing is denied. A defendant who receives the maximum sentence on each of several counts, the sentences to run concurrently, must be considered

  10. United States v. Esperdy

    345 F.2d 989 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 7 times

    No. 278, Docket 29276. Argued January 6, 1965. Decided May 27, 1965. Spar, Schlem Burroughs, New York City, for relator-appellant, Max K. Schlem, New York City, of counsel. James G. Greilsheimer, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., Roy Babitt, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty.), for respondent-appellee. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges. WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: Appellant petitioned the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the

  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,365 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,718 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  13. Section 1225 - Inspection by immigration officers; expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens; referral for hearing

    8 U.S.C. § 1225   Cited 1,276 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Setting standard for credible fear as "a significant possibility, taking into account the ... statements made by the alien ... and such other facts as are known to the officer, that the alien could establish eligibility for asylum"

  14. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility

  15. Section 1323 - Unlawful bringing of aliens into United States

    8 U.S.C. § 1323   Cited 62 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the landing of stowaways except to receive temporary medical treatment

  16. Section 233.1 - Contracts

    8 C.F.R. § 233.1   Cited 1 times

    The contracts with transportation lines referred to in section 233(c) of the Act may be entered into by the Executive Associate Commissioner for Programs, or by an immigration officer designated by the Executive Associate Commissioner for Programs on behalf of the government and shall be documented on Form I-420. The contracts with transportation lines referred to in section 233(a) of the Act shall be made by the Commissioner on behalf of the government and shall be documented on Form I-426. The