§
IN THE MATTER OF LI

8 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,410 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.

    447 U.S. 102 (1980)   Cited 1,840 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that information obtained in response to a FOIA request was a "public disclosure" for purposes of the Consumer Product Safety Act

  3. Perrin v. United States

    444 U.S. 37 (1979)   Cited 1,150 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that commercial bribery falls under the definition of bribery under the Travel Act, which was passed nine years before RICO was enacted

  4. United States v. James

    478 U.S. 597 (1986)   Cited 231 times
    Finding legislative history did not merit a departure from the plain language of the statute

  5. North Dakota v. United States

    460 U.S. 300 (1983)   Cited 120 times
    Finding state law hostile to federal interests and not applying it to easements acquired by United States

  6. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,712 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  7. Section 1153 - Allocation of immigrant visas

    8 U.S.C. § 1153   Cited 1,224 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Determining an applicant's age as " the age of the alien on the date on which an immigrant visa number becomes available for such alien . . . but only if the alien has sought to acquire the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence within one year of such availability; reduced by (B) the number of days in the period during which the applicable petition . . . was pending"

  8. Section 1155 - Revocation of approval of petitions; effective date

    8 U.S.C. § 1155   Cited 217 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority to revoke visa status petitions