In the Matter of Lettman

3 Cited authorities

  1. Chan Wing Cheung v. Hamilton

    298 F.2d 459 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 26 times
    Stating that it is proper to file a summary judgment motion without filing an answer
  2. Chan Wing Cheung v. Hamilton

    198 F. Supp. 154 (D.R.I. 1961)   Cited 4 times

    Civ. A. No. 2769. September 27, 1961. Thomas F. Vance, Jr., Pawtucket, R. I., for plaintiff. Raymond J. Pettine, U.S. Atty., Samuel S. Tanzi, Asst. U.S. Atty., Providence, R. I., for defendants. DAY, District Judge. This is an action wherein the plaintiff seeks a review of an order by the defendant, James A. Hamilton, Jr., District Director, U.S. Immigration Naturalization Service, denying his application for the creation of a record of his lawful admission for permanent residence under the provisions

  3. Sit Jay Sing v. Nice

    182 F. Supp. 292 (N.D. Cal. 1960)   Cited 4 times

    Civ. No. 38745. March 11, 1960. Robert S. Bixby, Fallon, Hargreaves Bixby, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff. Lynn J. Gillard, U.S. Atty., Charles E. Collett, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants. YOUNGDAHL, District Judge. This action for a declaratory judgment came on to be heard on cross-motions for summary judgment. Since the material facts are not in dispute and only a question of law is involved the Court is free to grant summary judgment. Plaintiff, "a native and citizen