§

In the Matter of Lehder

15 I&N Dec. 159 (B.I.A. 1975)
In the Matter of Lehder

3 Cited authorities

  1. Cooper v. Lockhart

    489 F.2d 308 (8th Cir. 1973)   Cited 65 times
    In Cooper v. Lockhart, 489 F.2d 308 (8th Cir. 1973), the court was concerned with the failure of the State of Michigan to promptly process to a conclusion its detainer against a parole violator who was convicted during his parole period of a crime in the State of Arkansas and confined there. The decision of necessity does not discuss due process within the framework disclosed by the statutes of the United States or the regulations promulgated thereunder for the handling of parole violators of the United States penal system.

  2. Chung Young Chew v. Boyd

    309 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 47 times
    Holding unauthenticated record inadmissible

  3. Slavik v. Miller

    89 F. Supp. 575 (W.D. Pa. 1950)   Cited 10 times

    Civ. A. No. 7918. March 23, 1950. Michael Hahalyak, Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner. Elliott W. Finkel, Special Assistant to U.S. Attorney, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent. GOURLEY, District Judge. The petitioner seeks to question the legality of a deportation order issued by the Attorney General of the United States through the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization. The proceeding has been entitled "Petition for Review." Consideration must be given whether the action is proper under the