§
In the Matter of L

4 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Norris

    300 U.S. 564 (1937)   Cited 82 times
    Concluding that perjury is not cured by a later truthful disclosure because "the oath administered to the witness calls on him freely to disclose the truth in the first instance and not to put the court and the parties to the disadvantage, hindrance, and delay of ultimately extracting the truth by cross-examination"

  2. United States ex rel. Guarino v. Uhl

    107 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1939)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that an offense must be "necessarily or inherently immoral" to constitute a CIMT under the immigration laws

  3. United States v. Schlotfeldt

    109 F.2d 106 (7th Cir. 1940)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 6978, 6979. January 2, 1940. Rehearing Denied January 29, 1940. Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division; Charles E. Woodward, Judge. Habeas corpus proceedings by the United States of America, on the relation of Stanislaw, also known as Stanley, Boraca, against Fred J. Schlotfeldt, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, and by the United States of America, on the relation of Agnieszka, also known as Marja, Boraca

  4. Section 231 - Civil disorders

    18 U.S.C. § 231   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Teaching or demonstrating to another the use, application, or making of any firearm or explosive or incendiary device "knowing or having reason to know or intending" that it will be unlawfully employed for use in, or in furtherance of, a civil disorder that may obstruct, delay, or adversely affect commerce