§

In the Matter of Kurtin

12 I&N Dec. 284 (B.I.A. 1967)
In the Matter of Kurtin

3 Cited authorities

  1. Rediker v. Rediker

    35 Cal.2d 796 (Cal. 1950)   Cited 72 times
    In Rediker v. Rediker, 35 Cal.2d 796 [ 221 P.2d 1, 20 A.L.R.2d 1152], we did not find it necessary to decide whether a foreign divorce decree could be attacked on these grounds, since it was to be assumed in the absence of evidence to the contrary that the plaintiff was a bona fide resident of Cuba and that therefore the foreign court had jurisdiction even if measured by our standards.

  2. Scott v. Scott

    51 Cal.2d 249 (Cal. 1958)   Cited 16 times

    Docket No. L.A. 24855. November 18, 1958. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Newcomb Condee, Judge. Affirmed. Monta W. Shirley and George W. Nilsson for Appellant. Hahn, Ross Saunders and E. Loyd Saunders for Respondent. McCOMB, J. Defendant Winifred C. Scott appeals from a judgment in a declaratory relief action decreeing that a divorce procured by plaintiff from her in the District of Bravos, State of Chihuahua, Republic of Mexico, on March 17, 1956, was valid.

  3. Gould v. Gould

    138 N.E. 490 (N.Y. 1923)   Cited 55 times
    In Gould v. Gould (235 N.Y. 14) the Court of Appeals dismissed the plaintiff's complaint for an absolute divorce upon the ground that there was a decree of divorce outstanding in favor of defendant rendered by the courts of France in an action in which plaintiff had appeared and participated.