§

In the Matter of Kulle

19 I&N Dec. 318 (B.I.A. 1985)
In the Matter of Kulle

23 Cited authorities

  1. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 747 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"

  2. Fedorenko v. United States

    449 U.S. 490 (1981)   Cited 454 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Government carries a heavy burden of proof in a proceeding to divest a naturalized citizen of his citizenship" because "loss [of citizenship] can have severe and unsettling consequences"

  3. United States v. Brown

    381 U.S. 437 (1965)   Cited 379 times
    Holding that a law barring Communist Party members from offices in labor unions is a bill of attainder

  4. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy

    342 U.S. 580 (1952)   Cited 561 times
    Holding that the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to deportation orders because "[d]eportation, however severe its consequences, has been consistently classified as a civil rather than a criminal procedure"

  5. Galvan v. Press

    347 U.S. 522 (1954)   Cited 387 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while aliens may receive procedural due process, the court's ability to review the substantive policy of immigration statutes is limited to review for rationality

  6. Marroquin-Manriquez v. I.N.S.

    699 F.2d 129 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 481 times
    Affirming that "[i]t is well established that the scope and conduct of discovery are within the sound discretion of the trial court."

  7. Marcello v. Bonds

    349 U.S. 302 (1955)   Cited 253 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it does not violate due process to have an adjudicator who is "subject to the supervision and control of officials in the Immigration Service charged with investigative and prosecuting functions"

  8. Laipenieks v. I.N.S.

    750 F.2d 1427 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that the government failed to establish deportability by "clear, convincing and unequivocal evidence" because procedural irregularities "seriously undermine[d] the trustworthiness of the statements made"

  9. Artukovic v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    693 F.2d 894 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 20 times
    Noting that doctrine of res judicata is flexibly applied in the administrative law context and holding that the government could not use offensive collateral estoppel based on a "hearing convened thirty years ago for a different purpose raising different issues under a different statute"

  10. Vasquez-Mondragon v. Immigration Natural

    560 F.2d 1225 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 14 times

    No. 77-1526. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. October 14, 1977. Eugenio Cazorla, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner. Griffin B. Bell, U.S. Atty. Gen., Philip Wilens, Chief, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Kenneth J. Mighell, U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., James P. Morris, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Gov't. Reg. Labor Sect., Rex Young, Atty., Crim. Div., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,717 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  13. Section 1106 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1106   Cited 4 times

    8 U.S.C. § 1106 Pub. L. 91-510, title IV, §422(a), Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1189 Section, act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §401, 66 Stat. 274, provided for establishment of Joint Committee on Immigration and Nationality, including its composition, necessity of membership on House or Senate Committee on the Judiciary, vacancies and election of chairman, functions, reports, submission of regulations to Committee, hearings and subpena, travel expenses, employment of personnel, payment of Committee