§

In the Matter of King and Yang

16 I&N Dec. 502 (B.I.A. 1978)
In the Matter of King and Yang

24 Cited authorities

  1. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte

    412 U.S. 218 (1973)   Cited 11,995 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding the State need not prove knowing-and-deliberate consent to search

  2. United States v. Brignoni-Ponce

    422 U.S. 873 (1975)   Cited 3,301 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it violated the Fourth Amendment to stop and "question [a vehicle's] occupants [about their immigration status] when the only ground for suspicion [was] that the occupants appear[ed] to be of Mexican ancestry"

  3. Fisher v. United States

    425 U.S. 391 (1976)   Cited 2,066 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that act of producing evidence may, in some circumstances, trigger Fifth Amendment safeguards

  4. United States v. Martinez-Fuerte

    428 U.S. 543 (1976)   Cited 1,660 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that border officers have "wide discretion" to stop, question, and refer individuals to secondary investigation at border checkpoints

  5. Andresen v. Maryland

    427 U.S. 463 (1976)   Cited 1,144 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an entire search warrant was not general and that materials related to the specific crime of false pretense could be seized, despite evidence in the record that other papers not within the scope of the warrant or otherwise improperly seized had been voluntarily returned by the state or suppressed by the district court

  6. Marchetti v. United States

    390 U.S. 39 (1968)   Cited 1,012 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that business owner could assert Fifth Amendment in refusing to register business as engaged in accepting wagers because registration requirement posed a real risk of future prosecution

  7. Shapiro v. United States

    335 U.S. 1 (1948)   Cited 449 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "essentially regulatory" recordkeeping may be required of private individuals without violating the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination

  8. United States v. Campos-Serrano

    404 U.S. 293 (1971)   Cited 168 times
    Holding that possession of a counterfeit alien registration receipt card was not an offense under Section 1546 because such cards were not "required" for entry

  9. Illinois Migrant Council v. Pilliod

    540 F.2d 1062 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 67 times
    Holding that the plaintiffs had standing where they had “shown a specific pattern of conduct, akin to an explicit policy,” that “demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of future harm”

  10. Au Yi Lau v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

    445 F.2d 217 (D.C. Cir. 1971)   Cited 52 times
    Recognizing that one accosted in apparent attempt to avoid being questioned was not clearly detained against his will when he thereafter readily acquiesced in the investigator's interrogation

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable