In the Matter of King and Yang

24 Cited authorities

Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
412 U.S. 218 (1973) Cited 12,145 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding the State need not prove knowing-and-deliberate consent to search
United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
422 U.S. 873 (1975) Cited 3,344 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that it violated the Fourth Amendment to stop and "question [a vehicle's] occupants [about their immigration status] when the only ground for suspicion [was] that the occupants appear[ed] to be of Mexican ancestry"
Fisher v. United States
425 U.S. 391 (1976) Cited 2,099 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that act of producing evidence may, in some circumstances, trigger Fifth Amendment safeguards
United States v. Martinez-Fuerte
428 U.S. 543 (1976) Cited 1,676 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that border officers have "wide discretion" to stop, question, and refer individuals to secondary investigation at border checkpoints
Andresen v. Maryland
427 U.S. 463 (1976) Cited 1,153 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that an entire search warrant was not general and that materials related to the specific crime of false pretense could be seized, despite evidence in the record that other papers not within the scope of the warrant or otherwise improperly seized had been voluntarily returned by the state or suppressed by the district court
Marchetti v. United States
390 U.S. 39 (1968) Cited 1,024 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that business owner could assert Fifth Amendment in refusing to register business as engaged in accepting wagers because registration requirement posed a real risk of future prosecution
Shapiro v. United States
335 U.S. 1 (1948) Cited 450 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "essentially regulatory" recordkeeping may be required of private individuals without violating the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
United States v. Campos-Serrano
404 U.S. 293 (1971) Cited 168 times
Holding that possession of a counterfeit alien registration receipt card was not an offense under Section 1546 because such cards were not "required" for entry
Illinois Migrant Council v. Pilliod
540 F.2d 1062 (7th Cir. 1976) Cited 67 times
Holding that the plaintiffs had standing where they had “shown a specific pattern of conduct, akin to an explicit policy,” that “demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of future harm”
Au Yi Lau v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
445 F.2d 217 (D.C. Cir. 1971) Cited 52 times
Recognizing that one accosted in apparent attempt to avoid being questioned was not clearly detained against his will when he thereafter readily acquiesced in the investigator's interrogation
Section 1251 - Transferred
8 U.S.C. § 1251 Cited 2,159 times 1 Legal Analyses
Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

In the Matter of King and Yang

24 Cited authorities

Holding the State need not prove knowing-and-deliberate consent to search

Holding that it violated the Fourth Amendment to stop and "question [a vehicle's] occupants [about their immigration status] when the only ground for suspicion [was] that the occupants appear[ed] to be of Mexican ancestry"

Holding that act of producing evidence may, in some circumstances, trigger Fifth Amendment safeguards

Holding that border officers have "wide discretion" to stop, question, and refer individuals to secondary investigation at border checkpoints

Holding that business owner could assert Fifth Amendment in refusing to register business as engaged in accepting wagers because registration requirement posed a real risk of future prosecution

Holding that "essentially regulatory" recordkeeping may be required of private individuals without violating the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination

Holding that possession of a counterfeit alien registration receipt card was not an offense under Section 1546 because such cards were not "required" for entry

Holding that the plaintiffs had standing where they had “shown a specific pattern of conduct, akin to an explicit policy,” that “demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of future harm”

Recognizing that one accosted in apparent attempt to avoid being questioned was not clearly detained against his will when he thereafter readily acquiesced in the investigator's interrogation

Delineating crimes that make alien deportable