§
In the Matter of K

4 Cited authorities

  1. Berger v. United States

    255 U.S. 22 (1921)   Cited 845 times
    Holding that the judge against whom an affidavit of bias is filed may pass on its legal sufficiency because "the reasons and facts for the belief the litigant entertains are an essential part of the affidavit, and must give fair support to the charge of a bent of mind that may prevent or impede impartiality of judgment."

  2. Ex Parte Am. Steel Barrel Co.

    230 U.S. 35 (1913)   Cited 211 times
    In Ex parte American Steel Barrel Co., 230 U.S. 35, the phase of the section presented here was not presented. There proceedings in bankruptcy had progressed to a decree of adjudication, and the judge who had conducted them was charged by certain creditors with bias and prejudice based on his rulings in the case.

  3. Montana Power Co. v. Public Service Commission

    12 F. Supp. 946 (D. Mont. 1935)   Cited 13 times
    In Montana Power Co. v. Public Service Commission, D.C., 12 F. Supp. 946, it was sought to disqualify a member of a state administrative agency because such member had prejudged the case prior to hearing.

  4. United States v. Flegenheimer

    14 F. Supp. 584 (D.N.J. 1935)   Cited 11 times

    October 22, 1935. F.W. H. Adams, U.S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, and J. Howard Carter, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., both of New York City, John Burke, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., and William F. Smith, Asst. U.S. Atty., for the District of New Jersey, of Trenton, N.J. J. Richard Davis, of New York City, John E. Toolan, of Perth Amboy, N.J., and George S. Silzer and Harry H. Weinberger, both of Newark, N.J., for defendant. CLARK, District Judge. The filing