§

In the Matter of Joquin

15 I&N Dec. 348 (B.I.A. 1975)
In the Matter of Joquin

9 Cited authorities

  1. Immigration Service v. Errico

    385 U.S. 214 (1966)   Cited 108 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that doubts as to the correct construction of a deportation statute "should be resolved in favor of the alien"

  2. Reid v. INS

    420 U.S. 619 (1975)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that alien who falsely represented himself to be a citizen is deportable as one who has entered without inspection because he "significantly frustrated the process for inspecting incoming aliens"

  3. Cortez-Flores v. I. N. S

    500 F.2d 178 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 8 times

    No. 74-2093. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. September 13, 1974. Joseph J. Rey, Jr., El Paso, Tex., for petitioners. William B. Saxbe, U.S. Atty. Gen., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., William S. Sessions, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., William E. Weinert, Immigration Nat., Ronald F. Ederer, Asst. U.S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., Troy A. Adams, Jr., Dist. Director, Immigration Nat.,

  4. Milande v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    484 F.2d 774 (7th Cir. 1973)   Cited 9 times
    In Milande, the Seventh Circuit "agreed" with the ruling in Cabuco-Flores and in like fashion held that the provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (f) are "available only when the fraud is relevant to the charge for which deportation is sought."

  5. Cabuco-Flores v. Immig. Naturalization Serv

    477 F.2d 108 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 9 times
    In Cabuco-Flores, the Ninth Circuit held that a deportation order based on overstaying one's visitor's visa did not bring into play the provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1251(f) because the deportation order "did not depend directly or indirectly upon the asserted misrepresentation in obtaining the visa."

  6. Preux v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    484 F.2d 396 (10th Cir. 1973)   Cited 4 times

    No. 73-1083. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1973. Decided September 7, 1973. James R. Barash, Colorado Springs, Colo. (Loa E. Bliss, Colorado Springs, Colo., on the brief), for petitioner. Bruce R. Heurlin, Atty., Dept. of Justice (John L. Murphy, Chief, Government Regulations Section, Crim. Div., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondents. Petition for review from the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Before BREITENSTEIN, McWILLIAMS and BARRETT, Circuit Judges. McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

  7. de Vargas v. INS

    409 F.2d 335 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 6 times

    No. 26041. December 3, 1968. Rehearing Denied March 21, 1969. Albert Armendariz, El Paso, Tex., for petitioner. Ramsey Clark, Atty. Gen. of the U.S., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Troy A. Adams, Jr., Dist. Director, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, New Orleans, La., Louis LaCour, U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., Ernest Morgan, U.S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., Claude D. Brown, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., Harriet R. Johnson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Eldon Mahon, U

  8. Hames-Herrera v. Rosenberg

    463 F.2d 451 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 2 times

    No. 71-2749. July 3, 1972. Richard T. Griffin (argued), of Griffin, Griffin Jackson, Pasadena, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Carolyn Reynolds, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., George K. Rosenberg, District Director, INS, Los Angeles, Cal., Stephen Suffin, INS, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Surreck, INS, San Pedro, Cal., Will Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United

  9. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable