In the Matter of Johnson

21 Cited authorities

  1. Garcia-Gonzales v. Immigration Nat. Service

    344 F.2d 804 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 46 times
    In Garcia-Gonzales v. Immigration Nat. Serv., 344 F.2d 804, 810 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 840, 86 S.Ct. 88, 15 L.Ed.2d 81 (1965), the Ninth Circuit noted "[W]e are aware that the Immigration and Naturalization Service has long held that a convicted person who has [received the benefit from expungement under California law]... cannot be deported under [section 241(a)(4)] of the Act."
  2. Tembruell v. Seattle

    64 Wn. 2d 503 (Wash. 1964)   Cited 37 times
    In Tembruell, this court held that a dismissed felony conviction (following a suspended and deferred sentence) was not a prior conviction that would justify ceasing payments under the police pension statute, "even though this sequence of events might be... a prior conviction in a later criminal action."
  3. State v. Shannon

    60 Wn. 2d 883 (Wash. 1962)   Cited 36 times
    Applying statutory requirement of credit for time served pending appeal to discretionary minimum term
  4. Burr v. Immigration Naturalization Service

    350 F.2d 87 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 23 times
    Noting that the IJ reinstated the petitioner's deportation order under § 1252(f), after a hearing at which the IJ found that petitioner had previously been deported based on conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude
  5. Wood v. Hoy

    266 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1959)   Cited 28 times
    In Wood, we rejected the BIA’s interpretation as "not what the statute says" because the BIA "applied the statute as if it read ‘single criminal act’ " rather than "single scheme of criminal misconduct."
  6. State v. Davis

    56 Wn. 2d 729 (Wash. 1960)   Cited 24 times
    In State v. Davis, 56 Wn.2d 729, 355 P.2d 344, it was held that the suspended sentence may be revoked even though the period covered by the sentence has expired.
  7. Kelly v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    349 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 13 times

    No. 19340. June 20, 1965. Sidney Broffman, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Francis C. Whelan, U.S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Civil Section, James R. Dooley, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and ELY, Circuit Judges, and PENCE, District Judge. BARNES, Circuit Judge: This is a petition to review an order of deportation affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to § 1105a of Title 8, United States Code. The

  8. Adams v. United States

    299 F.2d 327 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times
    In Adams v. United States, 299 F.2d 327 (9 Cir. 1962), where a defendant had been found guilty in the Superior Court for the State of California of being in possession of marijuana in violation of § 11500 of the California Health and Safety Code and was ordered committed to the Youth Authority for the term prescribed, by law, this Court held that he had been convicted within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1407.
  9. Gutierrez v. INS

    323 F.2d 593 (9th Cir. 1963)   Cited 12 times

    No. 18565. October 11, 1963. David C. Marcus, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Francis C. Whelan, U.S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief of Civil Section, and James R. Dooley, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and STEPHENS, Jr., District Judge. JERTBERG, Circuit Judge. Before us is a petition to review a final order of deportation in which petitioner asks us to determine that he is not a deportable alien and that the order

  10. Jaime v. Rhay

    59 Wn. 2d 58 (Wash. 1961)   Cited 12 times
    In Jaime v. Rhay, 59 Wn.2d 58, 60, 365 P.2d 772 (1961), we stated that "[t]he mere elapse of time is not compliance with [RCW 9.95.240] and does not dissolve the order of probation or deprive the court of its continuing jurisdiction."
  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable