§

In the Matter of Ibarra-Obando

12 I&N Dec. 576 (B.I.A. 1967)
In the Matter of Ibarra-Obando

12 Cited authorities

  1. Garcia-Gonzales v. Immigration Nat. Service

    344 F.2d 804 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 46 times
    In Garcia-Gonzales v. Immigration Nat. Serv., 344 F.2d 804, 810 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 840, 86 S.Ct. 88, 15 L.Ed.2d 81 (1965), the Ninth Circuit noted "[W]e are aware that the Immigration and Naturalization Service has long held that a convicted person who has [received the benefit from expungement under California law]... cannot be deported under [section 241(a)(4)] of the Act."

  2. Burr v. Immigration Naturalization Service

    350 F.2d 87 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 23 times
    Noting that the IJ reinstated the petitioner's deportation order under § 1252(f), after a hearing at which the IJ found that petitioner had previously been deported based on conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude

  3. Wood v. Hoy

    266 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1959)   Cited 28 times
    In Wood, we rejected the BIA’s interpretation as "not what the statute says" because the BIA "applied the statute as if it read ‘single criminal act’ " rather than "single scheme of criminal misconduct."

  4. Kelly v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    349 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 13 times

    No. 19340. June 20, 1965. Sidney Broffman, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Francis C. Whelan, U.S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Civil Section, James R. Dooley, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and ELY, Circuit Judges, and PENCE, District Judge. BARNES, Circuit Judge: This is a petition to review an order of deportation affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to § 1105a of Title 8, United States Code. The

  5. Hernandez-Valensuela v. Rosenberg

    304 F.2d 639 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 14 times

    No. 17637. June 13, 1962. John S. Rhoades, San Diego, Cal., for appellant. Francis C. Whelan, U.S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed and Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and TAVARES, District Judge. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. This case presents the question whether the conviction of a person for a narcotics offense which is followed by sentence under the Youth Offenders' Act is final for purposes of deportation under the

  6. Brownrigg v. U.S. Immigration Nat. Serv

    356 F.2d 877 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 7 times

    No. 20354. February 16, 1966. Atkins Jacobson, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant. Manuel L. Real, U.S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Civil Div., Larry L. Dier, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before BARNES and ELY, Circuit Judges, and CROCKER, District Judge. BARNES, Circuit Judge: This is a petition for review of an order of deportation. We have jurisdiction. ( 8 U.S.C. § 1105a.) Appellant was convicted of illicit possession of marijuana, violating

  7. Arrellano-Flores v. Hoy

    262 F.2d 667 (9th Cir. 1958)   Cited 13 times

    No. 15747. December 29, 1958. David C. Marcus, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Laughlin E. Waters, U.S. Atty., Richard A. Lavine, Bruce A. Bevan, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before POPE, CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges. CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge. Arrellano-Flores is a citizen and national of the Republic of Mexico who was lawfully admitted to the United States in 1925. After administrative proceedings the district director of Immigration and Naturalization is about to deport him under

  8. Ramirez-Villa v. Immigration Nat. Serv

    347 F.2d 985 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 2 times

    No. 19771. June 29, 1965. On Petition to Review an Order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. David C. Marcus, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Manuel L. Real, U.S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Civil Sec., Dzintra I. Janavs, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES, DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The title of this cause is amended to read as above set out. This case is governed by our decisions in Arrellano-Flores v. Hoy, 1958

  9. Burr v. Edgar

    292 F.2d 593 (9th Cir. 1961)   Cited 3 times
    Holding that district court had jurisdiction under § 2241 to consider challenge to criminal deportation order, and denying petition on the merits

  10. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 43,456 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  12. Section 1105 - Liaison with internal security officers; data exchange

    8 U.S.C. § 1105   Cited 178 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that review of orders of removal by the Board of Immigration Appeals is taken by filing a petition in a court of appeals