§

IN THE MATTER OF HIRA

11 I&N Dec. 824 (B.I.A. 1966)
IN THE MATTER OF HIRA

6 Cited authorities

  1. Karnuth v. United States

    279 U.S. 231 (1929)   Cited 64 times
    In Karnuth, supra, the Supreme Court drew a distinction between vested property rights and mere privileges in the context of Article III of the Jay Treaty and employed a rationale different from McCandless. Karnuth involved two Canadian residents (not Indians) who were denied entry into the United States because they had been classified as quota immigrants rather than tourists.

  2. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,904 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  3. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  4. Section 214.2 - Special requirements for admission, extension, and maintenance of status

    8 C.F.R. § 214.2   Cited 462 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Restating cap in 8 U.S.C. § 1184(g)(l)

  5. Section 41.25 - NATO representatives, officials, and employees

    22 C.F.R. § 41.25   Cited 6 times
    Specifying factors considered by consular officer in determining whether an alien is classifiable as a "temporary visitor for business"

  6. Section 41.55 - Aliens with extraordinary ability

    22 C.F.R. § 41.55   Cited 1 times

    (a)Requirements for O classification. An alien shall be classifiable under the provisions of INA 101(a)(15)(O) if: (1) The consular officer is satisfied that the alien qualifies under the provisions of that section; and either (2) With respect to the principal alien, the consular officer has received official evidence of the approval by DHS of a petition to accord such classification or of the extension by DHS of the period of authorized stay in such classification; or (3) The consular officer is