§

In the Matter of Hall

11 I&N Dec. 526 (B.I.A. 1966)
In the Matter of Hall

8 Cited authorities

  1. Johnson v. Johnson

    68 N.E.2d 499 (N.Y. 1946)   Cited 49 times
    In Johnson v. Johnson (295 N.Y. 477, 480, 481) Judge FULD, in interpreting section 1140-a of the Civil Practice Act, the precursor of section 236 Dom. Rel. of the Domestic Relations Law, pointed out that the Legislature "sought to remedy * * * the unhappy plight of the innocent wife" who hesitated to have her marriage annulled "at the cost of relinquishing all claim to support" or where the marriage is voided because of the wife's insanity or for any of the other causes where the wife is statutorily at fault.

  2. Matter of Haffner

    254 N.Y. 238 (N.Y. 1930)   Cited 40 times
    In Matter of Haffner's Estate, 254 N.Y. 238, 172 N.E. 483; University of Michigan v. McGuckin, 62 Neb. 489, 87 N.W. 180, 57 A.L.R. 917, affirmed on rehearing, 64 Neb. 300, 89 N.W. 778, 57 A.L.R. 917.

  3. Gonzalez v. Gonzalez

    34 Misc. 2d 193 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1962)   Cited 3 times

    March 29, 1962 Max Feigin for plaintiff. Pinter Cowan ( Edward M. Pinter of counsel), for defendant. ANTHONY M. LIVOTI, J. In this action tried before the court plaintiff Lorenzo Gonzalez seeks judgment declaring that the marriage entered into between plaintiff and defendant Eileen Donnellan Gonzalez, performed January 25, 1959, be declared null and void. Defendant in her counterclaim seeks a separation and further demands a money judgment for the humiliation, disgrace and mental anguish suffered

  4. Kaufman v. Kaufman

    177 App. Div. 162 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)   Cited 33 times
    In Kaufman v. Kaufman (177 App. Div. 162) the plaintiff was denied a judgment of annulment which he sought on the ground that the defendant had another husband living at the time of his marriage with her because he had persuaded and induced her to secure a foreign divorce and had furnished her the money to do so, and assured her that the divorce so obtained was valid.

  5. McCullen v. McCullen

    162 A.D. 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)   Cited 19 times

    May 29, 1914. Dix W. Noel, for the appellant. No appearance for the respondent. LAUGHLIN, J.: This action was brought to have a marriage formally celebrated between the parties on the 28th day of February, 1907, annulled on the ground that the defendant at the time of the celebration thereof had a husband living. On the 22d day of November, 1902, the defendant was married in due form to one Fickbohn in the city and county of New York, and the contract of marriage, duly signed, witnessed and acknowledged

  6. Stein v. Dunne

    119 A.D. 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)   Cited 7 times

    April 19, 1907. Charles Goldzier for the appellant. Morgan J. O'Brien, for the respondent. SCOTT, J.: The plaintiff sues for breach of a promise to marry. Defendant denies that he ever promised to marry plaintiff, and by way of separate defenses alleges that prior to the alleged agreement the plaintiff had been lawfully married to one Julius Stein, and had lived and cohabited with him as his wife, and that such marriage had never been annulled, nor had the parties ever been divorced from the bonds

  7. Beard v. City of New York

    83 N.E. 1132 (N.Y. 1907)

    Submitted November 18, 1907 Decided December 3, 1907 Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel ( James D. Bell and Jerome W. Coombs of counsel), for appellant. Ralph James M. Bullowa and Sutherland D. Smith for respondent. Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the ground that this is an appeal from an order only and not from any judgment finally determining the action; no opinion. Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ. Absent: O'BRIEN, J.

  8. Section 6 - Void marriages

    N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 6   Cited 126 times
    Stating that a second marriage is invalid if either party to that marriage is married already