§
In the Matter of H

14 Cited authorities

  1. Lawlor v. Nat'l Screen Serv.

    349 U.S. 322 (1955)   Cited 889 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that two suits were not "based on the same cause of action," because "[t]he conduct presently complained of was all subsequent to" the prior judgment and it "cannot be given the effect of extinguishing claims which did not even then exist and which could not possibly have been sued upon in the previous case"

  2. Helvering v. Mitchell

    303 U.S. 391 (1938)   Cited 1,008 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that civil tax penalties are remedial

  3. Cromwell v. County of Sac

    94 U.S. 351 (1876)   Cited 1,575 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding for the purpose of res judicata that, because the two suits involved separate contracts, a prior suit for recovery of coupons attached to bonds did not involve the same claim as a later suit for recovery of later maturing coupons attached to the same bonds

  4. Partmar Corp. v. Paramount Corp.

    347 U.S. 89 (1954)   Cited 121 times
    Observing that "[t]he power remained in the trial court until the entry of his final judgment to set aside, for appropriate reasons," orders previously entered in the case

  5. Mandoli v. Acheson

    344 U.S. 133 (1952)   Cited 40 times
    Finding involuntary the entry of the plaintiff-who was 23 or 24 years old at the time-into the Italian army, reasoning that "'[t]he choice of taking the oath or violating the law was, for a soldier in the army of Fascist Italy, no choice at all'"

  6. Lewis v. Frick

    233 U.S. 291 (1914)   Cited 111 times
    In Lewis v. Frick, 233 U.S. 291, 304, 34 S.Ct. 488, 58 L.Ed. 967, the point was held open whether the terminus ad quem in a warrant of deportation was "open to inquiry upon habeas corpus."

  7. Stone v. United States

    167 U.S. 178 (1897)   Cited 113 times
    In Stone v. United States, 167 U.S. 178, 189, 17 S.Ct. 778, 42 L.Ed. 127 (1897), we held that a party appealing from the judgment in one of two cases consolidated for trial could not also raise claims with respect to the other case.

  8. Winkelman v. General Motors Corporation

    48 F. Supp. 490 (S.D.N.Y. 1942)   Cited 31 times

    November 4, 1942. Consolidated action by Augusta Winkelman and others against the General Motors Corporation and others, to enjoin the further operation of allegedly illegal bonus plans and agreements and for other relief, wherein after findings of fact, conclusions of law and opinion had been filed by the court, an offer of compromise was made by the defendants, and objections to the offer of compromise were made by some of the stockholders. Proposed compromise or settlement disapproved conditionally

  9. Mannerfrid v. Brownell

    145 F. Supp. 55 (D.D.C. 1956)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. No. 4258-54. January 30, 1956. Jack Wasserman, Washington, D.C., Sam Harris, New York City, for plaintiff. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., Oliver Gasch, Frank H. Strickler and Joseph M.F. Ryan, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., for defendant. YOUNGDAHL, District Judge. This cause came on to be heard on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff is a native and citizen of Sweden who first came to the United States as a temporary business visitor on June 4, 1941. Extensions of his temporary

  10. Application of Mannerfrid

    101 F. Supp. 446 (S.D.N.Y. 1951)   Cited 4 times

    November 29, 1951. Jack Wasserman, Washington, D.C., Edward L. Dubroff, Brooklyn, N Y, of counsel, for petitioner. Edward J. Shaughnessy, Dist. Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York City, Monroe Kroll, New York City, of counsel, for respondent. S.H. KAUFMAN, District Judge. Petitioner, a native and national of Sweden, filed this petition for naturalization pursuant to the provisions of 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 707(a) and 711. Petitioner entered the United States as a temporary visitor for

  11. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 43,251 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,905 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  13. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable