§

In the Matter of Grazley

14 I&N Dec. 330 (B.I.A. 1973)
In the Matter of Grazley

13 Cited authorities

  1. Jordan v. De George

    341 U.S. 223 (1951)   Cited 716 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defrauding the United States of tax on distilled spirits is a serious crime involving moral turpitude

  2. Barber v. Gonzales

    347 U.S. 637 (1954)   Cited 81 times
    Concluding that assault with a deadly weapon is a crime that involves moral turpitude

  3. Burr v. Immigration Naturalization Service

    350 F.2d 87 (9th Cir. 1965)   Cited 23 times
    Noting that the IJ reinstated the petitioner's deportation order under § 1252(f), after a hearing at which the IJ found that petitioner had previously been deported based on conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude

  4. Giammario v. Hurney

    311 F.2d 285 (3d Cir. 1962)   Cited 19 times
    Holding that petitioner's guilt could not be retried on review of BIA removal order following guilty plea

  5. Morasch v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    363 F.2d 30 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 14 times
    In Morasch v. INS, 363 F.2d 30, 31 (9th Cir.1966), this court noted that the statute permitting deportation upon conviction of two crimes of moral turpitude did not allow for differentiation by age at the time of offense.

  6. Gonzales v. Barber

    207 F.2d 398 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 23 times
    In Barber, 207 F.2d at 400, as noted, we had held expressly that California Penal Code section 245, which then encompassed a wide range of aggravated assaults including assault with a firearm, was “per se” a crime involving moral turpitude.

  7. Brett v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    386 F.2d 439 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 8 times

    No. 161, Docket 30353. Argued November 9, 1967. Decided November 29, 1967. Edith Lowenstein, New York City, for petitioner. Daniel Riesel, Special Asst. U.S. Atty. (Francis J. Lyons, Special Asst. U.S. Atty., and Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, on the brief), for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and HAYS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks review of a final order of deportation pursuant to Section 106(a) of the Immigration and

  8. United States v. Savoretti

    200 F.2d 546 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 22 times
    Stating that "crimes of forgery, larceny, uttering, and stealing . . . are regarded as involving moral turpitude"

  9. Tillinghast v. Edmead

    31 F.2d 81 (1st Cir. 1929)   Cited 34 times
    Concluding larceny is crime involving moral turpitude

  10. Mercer v. Lence

    96 F.2d 122 (10th Cir. 1938)   Cited 15 times

    No. 1606. April 12, 1938. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Utah; Tillman D. Johnson, Judge. Habeas corpus proceeding by John Lawrence Mercer against M.F. Lence, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Labor, and the United States of America, to procure petitioner's release from custody for deportation to Canada. From an order discharging the writ and remanding petitioner to custody, petitioner appeals. Affirmed. Marshall Chapman

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  12. Section 1 - Repealed

    18 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 478 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining petty offenses as crimes "the penalty for which . . . does not exceed imprisonment for a period of six months or a fine of not more than $5,000 for an individual and $10,000 for a person other than an individual, or Page 838 both"

  13. Section 22-1301 - Affrays

    D.C. Code § 22-1301   Cited 28 times

    Whoever is convicted of an affray in the District shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01 or imprisoned not more than 180 days, or both. D.C. Code § 22-1301 July 16, 1912, 37 Stat. 192, ch. 235, § 1; Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 617, Pub. L. 88-241, § 11(a); Aug. 20, 1994, D.C. Law 10-151, § 107, 41 DCR 2608; June 11, 2013, D.C. Law 19-317, § 203(a)(1), 60 DCR 2064. Applicability of D.C. Law 19-317: Section 401 of D.C. Law 19-317 provided that the act shall apply only to offenses