§

In the Matter of Gonzalez

16 I&N Dec. 564 (B.I.A. 1978)
In the Matter of Gonzalez

19 Cited authorities

  1. Jarecki v. G. D. Searle Co.

    367 U.S. 303 (1961)   Cited 372 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that in a statute referring to "[i]ncome resulting from exploration, discovery, or prospecting" the word "discovery" is limited to only drilling and mining activities because the other words "strongly suggest that a precise and narrow application [of the word `discovery'] was intended"

  2. United States v. Campos-Serrano

    404 U.S. 293 (1971)   Cited 168 times
    Holding that possession of a counterfeit alien registration receipt card was not an offense under Section 1546 because such cards were not "required" for entry

  3. Immigration Service v. Errico

    385 U.S. 214 (1966)   Cited 108 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that doubts as to the correct construction of a deportation statute "should be resolved in favor of the alien"

  4. Reid v. INS

    420 U.S. 619 (1975)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that alien who falsely represented himself to be a citizen is deportable as one who has entered without inspection because he "significantly frustrated the process for inspecting incoming aliens"

  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Whisnant

    387 F.2d 774 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that the canons of construction mandate that courts give effect, when ever possible, to all parts of a statute and avoid interpretation that makes a part redundant or superfluous

  6. Market Co. v. Hoffman

    101 U.S. 112 (1879)   Cited 197 times
    Explaining that "[i]t is a cardinal rule of statutory construction that significance and effect shall, if possible, be accorded to every word"

  7. Jolley v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    441 F.2d 1245 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 23 times
    Noting that petitioner was "a United States citizen by virtue of his birth"

  8. Maiatico v. United States

    302 F.2d 880 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 33 times
    Holding the General Services Administration condemned property outside the statutorily-designated "taking area" and, therefore, acted without authority

  9. Velasquez Espinosa v. Immigration Nat

    404 F.2d 544 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that review of denial of motion to reopen and reconsider is limited to the abuse of discretion standard

  10. Cacho v. Immigration and Nat. Service

    547 F.2d 1057 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 75-2319, 75-2535. November 18, 1976. Robert S. Bixby (argued), of Fallon, Hargreaves, Bixby McVey, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner in No. 75-2319. Donald L. Ungar (argued), of Phelan, Simmons Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner in No. 75-2535. Richard I. Chaifetz, Atty. (argued), of Government Regulations Section, Crim. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. Before MERRILL and

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,718 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence

    8 U.S.C. § 1255   Cited 2,836 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists

  13. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable