§

In the Matter of Gonzalez

16 I&N Dec. 44 (B.I.A. 1976)
In the Matter of Gonzalez

13 Cited authorities

  1. United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod

    263 U.S. 149 (1923)   Cited 345 times
    Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."

  2. Avila-Gallegos v. I. N. S

    525 F.2d 666 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that, “[r]egardless of the legality of [the petitioner's] arrest,” his “deportation hearing testimony” about the “illegal manner of his entry” was admissible and, indeed, proved his deportability

  3. La Franca v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    413 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times
    Finding that the agency properly refused to reopen the petitioner's deportation hearing, based, in part, on the fact that, even assuming the unlawfulness of his arrest, it relied upon the concession of deportability by his counsel at the hearing and not “any statements taken or evidence seized at the time of his arrest”

  4. Guzman-Flores v. U.S. Immigration Nat. Serv

    496 F.2d 1245 (7th Cir. 1974)   Cited 7 times

    No. 73-1313, 73-1525. Heard April 9, 1974. Decided May 28, 1974. Ralph M. Schelly, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. Mary Jo Grotenrath, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., James R. Thompson, U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before SWYGERT, Chief Judge, SPRECHER, Circuit Judge and NOLAND, District Judge District Judge James E. Noland of the Southern District of Indiana is sitting by designation. NOLAND, District Judge. These

  5. Huerta-Cabrera v. Imm. Nat. Serv

    466 F.2d 759 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 6 times
    In Huerta-Cabrera v. INS, 466 F.2d 759 (7th Cir. 1972), the Court of Appeals for this circuit, in reviewing a deportation proceeding, noted in passing "the constitutional ramifications of Section [1357(a)].

  6. DE LUCIA v. FLAGG

    297 F.2d 58 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 9 times
    In De Lucia, an alien deportation case, the respondent had, among other things, been convicted in Italy of voluntary homicide.

  7. United States v. Neelly

    207 F.2d 281 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 10830. September 29, 1953. Rehearing Denied October 22, 1953. Edward A. Biggs, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Otto Kerner, Jr., U.S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, Anthony Scariano, Asst. U.S. Attys., John M. McWhorter, District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Chicago, Ill., for appellee. Before MAJOR, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, quashing

  8. Vlisidis v. Holland

    245 F.2d 812 (3d Cir. 1957)   Cited 10 times
    In Vlisidis v. Holland, 3 Cir., 245 F.2d 812, at page 814, Circuit Judge Hastie said: "Actually, it was necessary to show only the single fact that the respondent was an alien, for, once that is proved, the legislative scheme requires the alien to justify his presence within the United States. 66 Stat. 234, 8 U.S.C. § 1361."

  9. Vlisidis v. Holland

    150 F. Supp. 678 (E.D. Pa. 1957)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. Nos. 21438, 21463. April 18, 1957. Judgment Affirmed July 3, 1957. J. J. Kilimnik, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. W. Wilson White, U.S. Atty., Louis C. Bechtle, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., Gilbert Zimmerman, Regional Counsel, Southeast Region Immigration Naturalization Service, Richmond, Va., of counsel, for defendant. LORD, District Judge. These are like civil actions for declaratory judgments and judicial review. The plaintiffs have been found to be aliens subject to deportation

  10. Goncalves-Rosa v. Shaughnessy

    151 F. Supp. 906 (S.D.N.Y. 1957)   Cited 3 times

    Civil 120-100. June 10, 1957. Jack Greenberg, New York City, for plaintiff, J.J. Kilimnik, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel. Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., for the Southern Dist. of New York, New York City, for defendant, Charles J. Hartenstine, Jr., Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, of counsel. LEVET, District Judge. This matter involves two motions. In the first motion the plaintiff seeks a temporary injunction against deportation by the defendant. In the second motion the defendant asks for dismissal

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable