§

In the Matter of Garcia

12 I&N Dec. 628 (B.I.A. 1968)
In the Matter of Garcia

6 Cited authorities

  1. De Sylva v. Ballentine

    351 U.S. 570 (1956)   Cited 309 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts must look to state law to determine child's legal status for inheritance before evaluating the child's renewal rights under the Copyright Act

  2. Estate of Baird

    193 Cal. 225 (Cal. 1924)   Cited 94 times

    S. F. No. 10226. February 16, 1924. APPEAL from a decree of partial distribution of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from special verdicts on issues concerning adoption of an illegitimate child. T.I. Fitzpatrick, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Mastick Partridge, Karl C. Partridge and Joseph T. O'Connor for Appellants. C.M. Fickert, E.A. Cunha, R.P. Henshall and Robert R. Moody for Respondent. LAWLOR, J. The petitioner, David Jennings

  3. Ballentine v. De Sylva

    226 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1955)   Cited 7 times
    In Ballentine v. De Sylva, 226 F.2d 623, 625 (9th Cir. 1955), aff'd, 351 U.S. 570, 76 S.Ct. 974, 100 L.Ed. 1415 (1956), a statute provided that the "widow... or children" of a deceased author of a copyrighted work may apply for an extension of the copyright.

  4. In re Adoption of McGrew

    183 Cal. 177 (Cal. 1920)   Cited 17 times

    S. F. No. 9141. June 16, 1920. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco vacating on order of adoption. J.W. Mahon, Judge Presiding. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Byron C. Parker and Thomas P. Wickes for Appellant. Dahlin Jackson for Respondent. SHAW, J. This is an appeal from an order purporting to vacate a previous order whereby the court had declared that the child, Francelia McGrew, was duly adopted by the appellant, Hazel

  5. Wolf v. Gall

    32 Cal.App. 286 (Cal. Ct. App. 1916)   Cited 19 times
    In Wolf v. Gall, 32 Cal.App. 286, it appeared that Arturo Wolf and Maria Julia Wolf both born out of wedlock sought to have a share in property as heirs at law of their deceased grandmother by right of representation of their deceased father, they claiming to have been legitimated by virtue of section 215 of the civil code.

  6. Garner v. Judd

    136 Cal. 394 (Cal. 1902)   Cited 8 times

    S.F. No. 2361. May 22, 1902. APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Humboldt County granting letters of administration to the respondent and refusing letters to the appellant. G.W. Hunter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Henry L. Ford, E.M. Frost, and J.S. Burnell, for Appellant. Mahan Mahan, for Respondent. Anderson Anderson, Henry E. Carter, Dockweiler Carter, Garber, Creswell Garber, J.J. Dwyer, and Thomas F. Barry, Amici Curiæ, for an equitable construction of section