§

In the Matter of Gabouriel

13 I&N Dec. 742 (B.I.A. 1971)
In the Matter of Gabouriel

7 Cited authorities

  1. Immigration Service v. Errico

    385 U.S. 214 (1966)   Cited 108 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that doubts as to the correct construction of a deportation statute "should be resolved in favor of the alien"

  2. LEE FOOK CHUEY v. IMMIGRATION NATURALIZATION

    439 F.2d 244 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 26 times
    In Lee Fook Chuey, supra, we stated the essence of the qualitative/quantitative distinction thusly: "[q]uantitative restrictions in the immigration laws serve to limit the number of immigrants (e. g., quota restrictions) while qualitative restrictions are intended to exclude those who are mentally, morally or physically unfit or undesirable."

  3. United States v. Osuna-Picos

    443 F.2d 907 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 9 times

    No. 26549 May 26, 1971. George Haverstick (argued), San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Joseph Sureck (argued), Regional Counsel, I NS, San Pedro, Cal., Harry D. Steward, U.S. Atty., Brian E. Michaels, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Before BARNES and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and GRAY, District Judge. Hon. William P. Gray, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of his conviction under

  4. Muslemi v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    408 F.2d 1196 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 9 times

    No. 22419. March 17, 1969. Milton T. Simmons (argued), of Phelan, Simmons Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. John Milano (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., Stephen Suffin, INS, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Sureck, Regional Counsel, San Pedro, Cal., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges. HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge: Petitioner seeks review of a final deportation order of the Board of Immigration Appeals entered against him in a proceeding

  5. Vitales v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    443 F.2d 343 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 7 times

    No. 26686. May 28, 1971. Robert S. Bixby (argued), of Fallon, Hargreaves Bixby, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Charles Gordon (argued), Gen. Counsel, I.N.S., Washington, D.C., James L. Browning, Jr., U.S. Atty., Stephen Suffin, Atty., I.N.S., San Francisco, Cal., John N. Mitchell, U.S. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BARNES, DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and GRAY, District Judge. Honorable William P. Gray, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting

  6. Gambino v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    419 F.2d 1355 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 8 times

    No. 106, Docket 31781. Argued November 3, 1969. Decided January 7, 1970. Edward J. Ennis, New York City (Stanley N. Zwaik, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner-appellant. Daniel Riesel, Special Asst. U.S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty. for the Southern District of New York, of counsel), for respondent-appellee. Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge. Petitioner seeks review under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

  7. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable