In the Matter of G---- T

2 Cited authorities

  1. Dunlap v. State

    160 S.W.2d 529 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)   Cited 1 times

    No. 21867. Delivered April 1, 1942. 1. — Theft by Conversion — Evidence. In order for defendant to be guilty of the offense of theft by conversion by bailee of personal property, the facts must be sufficient to show a bailment of personalty to the defendant. 2. — Theft by Conversion — Bailment. An essential element to constitute a bailment is that the bailor deliver the possession of the property to the bailee for a specific purpose, retaining the title thereto. 3. — Theft by Conversion — Evidence

  2. Creale v. the State

    71 Tex. Crim. 9 (Tex. Crim. App. 1913)   Cited 1 times

    No. 2470. Decided May 21, 1913. Rehearing denied June 11, 1913. 1. — Theft — Intimidation — Witness. Where, upon cross-examination, the main State's witness testified that she had first declined to file a complaint against defendant, there was no error in permitting the State to show that from the words and conduct of defendant she was prevented from doing so through fear. 2. — Same — Remarks by Judge — Presence and Hearing of Jury. Where the bill of exceptions failed to show that the remarks by