§

In the Matter of G---- R

5 I&N Dec. 18 (B.I.A. 1953)
In the Matter of G---- R

5 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Babb

    103 Cal.App.2d 326 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951)   Cited 20 times

    Docket No. 4599. April 9, 1951. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Ellsworth Meyer, Judge. Affirmed. Prosecution for infamous crime against nature. Judgment of conviction of vagrancy, affirmed. William W. Larsen for Appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Howard S. Goldin, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. VALLEE, J. Defendant was charged in one count with the infamous crime against nature. He was convicted by

  2. State v. Harlowe

    174 Wn. 227 (Wash. 1933)   Cited 12 times
    In State v. Harlowe, 174 Wn. 227, 24 P.2d 601 (1933), we considered RCW 9.87.010(7), recognized the common and ordinary meaning of the terms employed and held that the provision was not vague and uncertain. Since that time, we have further considered and somewhat limited or narrowed the meaning of the word "disorderly" as used in the context of the provision.

  3. People v. Craig

    152 Cal. 42 (Cal. 1907)   Cited 37 times
    In People v. Craig, 152 Cal. 42 [ 91 P. 997], in dealing with the question of striking out evidence where a witness has given an answer partly competent and partly incompetent, the supreme court, relying upon the Rodley case, states the law as follows: "It was necessary, however, for the appellant, in moving to strike out, to specify the objectionable part of the answer and confine his motion to that, and a part of the answer being strictly responsive and his motion embracing the whole, the court was technically correct in overruling it."

  4. In re Tom Wong

    122 Cal.App. 672 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932)   Cited 3 times

    Docket No. 1649. April 19, 1932. PROCEEDING on Habeas Corpus to secure release of petitioner from custody after conviction of vagrancy. Writ discharged; prisoner remanded. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. McGettigan, Toland Baumgarten for Petitioner. Leo A. Cunningham for Respondent. STURTEVANT, J. A purported complaint was filed in the Municipal Court of San Francisco against the petitioner; he was arrested and brought before the court; a trial was had and he was found guilty and

  5. In re McCue

    7 Cal.App. 765 (Cal. Ct. App. 1908)   Cited 17 times

    Crim. No. 82. March 25, 1908. PETITION for discharge on writ of habeas corpus, directed to the sheriff of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. Wade McDonald, for Petitioner. L. R. Kirby, District Attorney, and H. S. Utley, Assistant District Attorney, for Respondent. ALLEN, P. J. — Application for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner is serving a sentence imposed on account of a violation of subdivision 5, section 647, Penal Code. This subdivision provides: "Every idle