§

In the Matter of G---- Q

9 I&N Dec. 376 (B.I.A. 1961)
In the Matter of G---- Q

6 Cited authorities

  1. Galvan v. Press

    347 U.S. 522 (1954)   Cited 388 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while aliens may receive procedural due process, the court's ability to review the substantive policy of immigration statutes is limited to review for rationality

  2. Rowoldt v. Perfetto

    355 U.S. 115 (1957)   Cited 49 times
    Holding that record was "too insubstantial" to demonstrate "meaningful association" required by INA for deportation

  3. Jimenez v. Barber

    252 F.2d 550 (9th Cir. 1958)   Cited 32 times
    Suggesting that a district court should grant an order prohibiting deportation "until the Board could act upon [the alien's motion to reopen]" where there is a "substantial question" as to deportability

  4. Scales v. United States

    260 F.2d 21 (4th Cir. 1958)   Cited 22 times
    In Scales, the defendant contended the indictment was invalid because the grand jury was illegally impaneled, in that the panel did not consist of persons whose names were publicly drawn from a box containing the names of not less than three hundred qualified persons; it was held the defendants waived the point by failing to comply with the provisions of Rule 12.

  5. Gastelum-Quinones v. Rogers

    286 F.2d 824 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 1 times

    No. 15429. Argued October 27, 1960. Decided December 8, 1960. Petition for Rehearing Denied January 9, 1961. Mr. David Rein, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Joseph Forer, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Gilbert Zimmerman, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U.S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee. Before EDGERTON, DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges. Judge EDGERTON took no part in the consideration or decision of

  6. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable