§

In the Matter of G---- M

7 I&N Dec. 40 (B.I.A. 1956)
In the Matter of G---- M

6 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,687 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Galvan v. Press

    347 U.S. 522 (1954)   Cited 389 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while aliens may receive procedural due process, the court's ability to review the substantive policy of immigration statutes is limited to review for rationality

  3. F.C.C. v. Allentown Broadcasting Co.

    349 U.S. 358 (1955)   Cited 90 times
    Upholding FCC reversal of hearing examiner

  4. United States v. Miller

    87 F. Supp. 285 (S.D.N.Y. 1949)   Cited 4 times

    Civ. 53-187. December 1, 1949. Rosenblatt Spielberg, New York City, for petitioner. Irving H. Saypol, United States Attorney, New York City (William J. Sexton, Assistant United States Attorney, Lester Friedman, Attorney, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, New York City, of counsel), for respondent Miller. IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge. The relator herein seeks an order sustaining a writ of habeas corpus. The relator, Hirsch Teper, a native and citizen of Great Britain

  5. United States v. Karnuth

    28 F. Supp. 597 (W.D.N.Y. 1939)   Cited 1 times

    July 26, 1939. Proceeding by the United States, on the relation of Apostolas Vassili Percas, against Arthur J. Karnuth, District Director of Immigration, and Henry W. Fogarty, Inspector, wherein relator seeks release by habeas corpus from custody of the immigration authorities by virtue of a warrant of deportation. Writ dismissed and relator remanded to custody of immigration authorities. Milo I. Tomanovich, of Rochester, N.Y., for relator. George L. Grobe, U.S. Atty., of Buffalo, N. Y. (Goodman

  6. Section 231 - Civil disorders

    18 U.S.C. § 231   Cited 243 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Teaching or demonstrating to another the use, application, or making of any firearm or explosive or incendiary device "knowing or having reason to know or intending" that it will be unlawfully employed for use in, or in furtherance of, a civil disorder that may obstruct, delay, or adversely affect commerce