§
In the Matter of G

3 Cited authorities

  1. Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan

    333 U.S. 6 (1948)   Cited 206 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting government's definition of provision authorizing deportation for multiple criminal convictions

  2. Biddle v. Perovich

    274 U.S. 480 (1927)   Cited 63 times
    Concluding that requiring consent “would permit the President to decide that justice requires the diminution of a term * * * without consulting the convict, but would deprive him of the power in the most important cases and require him to permit an execution which he had decided ought not to take place,” in the absence of the recipient's consent to the clemency

  3. People ex Rel. Prisament v. Brophy

    287 N.Y. 132 (N.Y. 1941)   Cited 43 times

    Argued October 16, 1941 Decided November 27, 1941 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, UNDERWOOD, J. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Henry Epstein, Edward T. Boyle and Patrick H. Clune of counsel), for appellant. Thomas E. Dewey, District Attorney, New York County ( Stanley H. Fuld of counsel), amicus curiae. Martin Prisament, in person, respondent. LEHMAN, Ch. J. The relator on March 11, 1940, was convicted, in the Court of General Sessions of the County