§
In the Matter of G

12 Cited authorities

  1. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath

    339 U.S. 33 (1950)   Cited 443 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Administrative Procedure Act required deportation hearings even though current INS regulations did not

  2. Viereck v. United States

    318 U.S. 236 (1943)   Cited 330 times
    Finding that the prosecutor's conduct prejudiced the defendant's right to a fair trial and was "offensive to the dignity and good order with which all proceedings in court should be conducted" and quoting language in Berger, 295 U.S. at 88, 55 S.Ct. at 633, which stressed that the role of the prosecutor in a criminal case is to see that justice is done

  3. Mahler v. Eby

    264 U.S. 32 (1924)   Cited 230 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government failed to comply "with all the statutory requirements"

  4. Luria v. United States

    231 U.S. 9 (1913)   Cited 200 times
    In Luria v. United States, 231 U.S. 9, 34 S.Ct. 10, 58 L.Ed. 101 (1913), the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a predecessor statute that contained the rebuttable presumption now found in § 1451(d).

  5. Johannessen v. United States

    225 U.S. 227 (1912)   Cited 165 times
    Holding that the retroactive effect of a denaturalization order does not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws

  6. Eichenlaub v. Shaughnessy

    338 U.S. 521 (1950)   Cited 29 times
    In United States ex rel. Eichenlaub v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 521, 70 S.Ct. 329, 94 L.Ed. 307 (1950), the Supreme Court was confronted with a case involving naturalized citizens, whose citizenship was later revoked and cancelled ab initio for fraud in the procurement.

  7. Bugajewitz v. Adams

    228 U.S. 585 (1913)   Cited 91 times
    Holding that the determination that an alien is an undesirable person "is not a conviction of crime, nor is the deportation a punishment; it is simply a refusal by the Government to harbor persons whom it does not want"

  8. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy

    90 F. Supp. 397 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)   Cited 4 times

    February 9, 1950. Carol King, Isidore Englander, New York City (Blanch Freedman, New York City, of counsel), attorneys for petitioner. Irving H. Saypol, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York City (Clarke S. Ryan, Assistant United States Attorney, Lester Friedman, New York City, of counsel), attorney for respondent. LEIBELL, District Judge. The petitioner, Peter Harisiades, an alien, sued out a writ of habeas corpus on July 1, 1949, claiming that he had been arrested

  9. Section 611 - Definitions

    22 U.S.C. § 611   Cited 190 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Defining "foreign principal" for purposes of FARA to include foreign governments, foreign political parties, certain individuals outside the United States, and foreign private businesses

  10. Section 612 - Registration statement

    22 U.S.C. § 612   Cited 75 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Requiring disclosure

  11. Section 618 - Enforcement and penalties

    22 U.S.C. § 618   Cited 46 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Establishing criminal penalties for certain willful violations of disclosure requirements

  12. Section 601 - Repealed

    22 U.S.C. § 601   Cited 6 times

    22 U.S.C. § 601 June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948 Section, acts June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title VIII, §3, 40 Stat. 226; Mar. 28, 1940, ch. 72, §6, 54 Stat. 80, related to acting as a foreign agent without notice to Secretary of State. See section 951 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.