§
In the Matter of G

23 Cited authorities

  1. Kercheval v. United States

    274 U.S. 220 (1927)   Cited 995 times
    Holding petitioner's initial guilty plea to mail fraud, later vacated by district court at request of petitioner, could not then be put before a jury at trial as evidence of petitioner's guilt

  2. Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan

    333 U.S. 6 (1948)   Cited 206 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting government's definition of provision authorizing deportation for multiple criminal convictions

  3. People v. Banks

    53 Cal.2d 370 (Cal. 1959)   Cited 275 times
    Holding that a guilty plea results in a "conviction" for purposes of a recidivism statute

  4. Lehmann v. Carson

    353 U.S. 685 (1957)   Cited 47 times
    Finding it "indisputable" that Congress intended to legislate retrospectively when it provided for deportation of those who committed specified crimes "at any time after entry"

  5. Stephens v. Toomey

    51 Cal.2d 864 (Cal. 1959)   Cited 138 times
    Stating that, upon a Section 1203.4 dismissal, the probationer is "entitled to . . . have the proceedings expunged from the record"

  6. In re Phillips

    17 Cal.2d 55 (Cal. 1941)   Cited 100 times

    Docket No. L.A. 17367. January 17, 1941. PETITION to set aside an order of disbarment and restore petitioner's name to roll of attorneys. Denied. Joe Wapner for Petitioner. Philbrick McCoy and Claude Minard for State Bar. GIBSON, C.J. Petitioner, an attorney at law, on July 1, 1937, was found guilty in the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude. On July 13, 1937, a certified copy of the record of conviction was filed with this court and an order was

  7. Kelly v. Municipal Court

    160 Cal.App.2d 38 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958)   Cited 39 times
    In Kelly v. Municipal Court, 160 Cal.App.2d 38, 324 P.2d 990, there was an alleged violation of Section 288(a), California Penal Code, which defined a morals offense.

  8. Pino v. Nicolls

    215 F.2d 237 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that "[t]he mere possibility of [the conviction being overturned] does not defeat deportation of the convicted alien; though of course if, prior to deportation, he has succeeded in one of these ways in upsetting his conviction, it can no longer serve as a basis for deportation"

  9. Wood v. Hoy

    266 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1959)   Cited 28 times
    In Wood, we rejected the BIA’s interpretation as "not what the statute says" because the BIA "applied the statute as if it read ‘single criminal act’ " rather than "single scheme of criminal misconduct."

  10. Meyer v. Board of Medical Examiners

    34 Cal.2d 62 (Cal. 1949)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that section 1203.4 does not bar use of the underlying conviction in professional disciplinary proceedings, and noting that the statute is "so qualified in its application [as to not] obliterate the record of conviction" for most purposes

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  12. Section 1182a to 1182c - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1182a - 8 U.S.C. § 1182c   Cited 9 times

    8 U.S.C. § 1182a to 1182c Pub. L. 87-301, §24(a)(1), (3), Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 657 Section 1182a, act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1254, §4, 68 Stat. 1145, related to admission of aliens who were either convicted, or who admitted the commission, of a misdemeanor. Section 1182b, Pub. L. 85-316, §5, Sept. 11, 1957, 71 Stat. 640, permitted admission of an alien spouse, child or parent excludable for crime involving moral turpitude in cases of hardship, when not contrary to national welfare or security, and