§
In the Matter of G

15 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Norris

    300 U.S. 564 (1937)   Cited 82 times
    Concluding that perjury is not cured by a later truthful disclosure because "the oath administered to the witness calls on him freely to disclose the truth in the first instance and not to put the court and the parties to the disadvantage, hindrance, and delay of ultimately extracting the truth by cross-examination"

  2. Kaplan v. Tod

    267 U.S. 228 (1925)   Cited 110 times
    Holding a girl was under official restraint even though she was "handed over to the Hebrew Sheltering and Immigrant Aid Society," which in turn allowed her to live with her father

  3. Hansen v. Haff

    291 U.S. 559 (1934)   Cited 38 times
    Determining on habeas review whether an alien entered for an "immoral purpose"

  4. Zartarian v. Billings

    204 U.S. 170 (1907)   Cited 26 times
    Noting that the individual “was debarred from entering the United States ... and, never having legally landed, of course could not have dwelt within the United States”

  5. United States v. Reimer

    79 F.2d 513 (2d Cir. 1935)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that fraud is inherent where an individual makes false statements on behalf of an alien to aid the alien in obtaining naturalization

  6. Guarneri v. Kessler

    98 F.2d 580 (5th Cir. 1938)   Cited 11 times
    In Guarneri v. Kessler, 98 F.2d 580, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that conspiring to smuggle and conceal imported alcohol with intent to defraud the revenue was a crime involving moral turpitude because of the intention to defraud.

  7. Nishimoto v. Nagle

    44 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1930)   Cited 15 times
    In Nishimoto v. Nagle (C.C.A.) 44 F.2d 304, deportation was upheld because of a single sentence imposing concurrent imprisonment for several offenses.

  8. Ponzi v. Ward

    7 F. Supp. 736 (D. Mass. 1934)   Cited 9 times

    No. 5201. July 30, 1934. Peter Maggio, of Everett, Mass., for plaintiff. Francis J.W. Ford, U.S. Atty., and Arthur J.B. Cartier, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Boston, Mass., for defendant. BREWSTER, District Judge. This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus heard upon the merits before writ issued. By agreement of parties, it was submitted upon the record in the Immigration Bureau. The petitioner is held upon a deportation warrant issued September 28, 1927. The reason for the delay in executing the

  9. Tassari v. Schmucker

    53 F.2d 570 (4th Cir. 1931)   Cited 11 times

    No. 3218. November 7, 1931. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk; D. Lawrence Groner and Luther B. Way, Judges. Habeas corpus proceedings by Francisco R. Tassari, opposed by Edwin B. Schmucker, District Director of Immigration at Norfolk, Virginia, and another. From an order of dismissal and remand, petitioner appeals. Affirmed. J.L. Morewitz, of Norfolk, Va. (Morewitz Morewitz, of Newport News and Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for appellant

  10. Masaichi Ono v. Carr

    56 F.2d 772 (9th Cir. 1932)   Cited 9 times

    No. 6630. March 7, 1932. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Central Division of the Southern District of California; William P. James, Judge. Habeas corpus proceeding by Masaichi Ono against Walter E. Carr, District Director, United States Immigration Service, District No. 31. From an order discharging the writ and remanding petitioner to the custody of the United States Immigration Service for return to Japan, petitioner appeals. Affirmed. J. Edward Keating and Theodore