§
In the Matter of G

2 Cited authorities

  1. Coykendall v. Skrmetta

    22 F.2d 120 (5th Cir. 1927)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that "it cannot well be supposed that the words in question were intended to refer to anything other than a condition of dependence on the public for support," and therefore that the public charge provision did not include the public expense imposed by imprisonment

  2. People v. Revolta

    162 Misc. 555 (N.Y. Mag. Ct. 1937)   Cited 1 times

    April 14, 1937. W.F.X. Geoghan, District Attorney [ Samuel A. Pease, Deputy Assistant District Attorney], for the plaintiff. Jacob Siegfried, for the defendant. RUDICH, C.M. The defendant is charged with violating section 974 of the Penal Law in that on February 18, 1937, he had in his possession a slip of paper containing ten numbers which have been conclusively described as policy numbers, representing a total wager of one dollar and fifty cents. The defendant made no admissions when apprehended