§
In the Matter of Eden

21 Cited authorities

  1. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,410 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  2. INS v. Phinpathya

    464 U.S. 183 (1984)   Cited 248 times
    Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning

  3. United States v. Kamer

    781 F.2d 1380 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 82 times
    Holding that an appellate court should confine its review to the record of the plea proceeding

  4. United States v. Torrez-Flores

    624 F.2d 776 (7th Cir. 1980)   Cited 71 times
    Holding that challenges to an original sentence cannot be raised during probation revocation proceedings

  5. United States v. Condit

    621 F.2d 1096 (10th Cir. 1980)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that, for purposes of Section 2255, supervised release constitutes "custody"

  6. Nicholas v. United States

    527 F.2d 1160 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 32 times

    No. 75-2411. January 9, 1976. John K. Van De Kamp, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant. William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before BARNES, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. OPINION HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge: The district court held that it had no jurisdiction to grant probation to Nicholas because (1) the five-year probationary period prescribed by 18 U.S.C. § 3651

  7. United States v. Rodgers

    588 F.2d 651 (8th Cir. 1978)   Cited 18 times
    In Rodgers, for instance, the defendant had been sentenced to three years imprisonment, with six months to be served in prison and 2 1/2 years probation.

  8. Smith v. United States

    505 F.2d 893 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 21 times
    In Smith the defendant challenged the reinstatement of his probation, contending that a term of probation is not a "sentence" and that further probation was not a sentencing alternative that the district court could properly consider.

  9. United States v. Fultz

    482 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1973)   Cited 20 times

    No. 72-1687. Submitted April 13, 1973. Decided July 25, 1973. Wilfred J. Ritz, Director, Alderson Legal Assistance Program, School of Law, Lexington, Va., for appellant. James E. Reeves, U.S. Atty., and J. Patrick Glynn, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Before LAY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges, and TALBOT SMITH, Senior District Judge. Hon. Talbot Smith, United States Senior District Judge, Eastern District

  10. United States v. Glasgow

    389 F. Supp. 217 (D.D.C. 1975)   Cited 17 times

    Crim. No. 1028-73. January 27, 1975. Jason D. Kogan, Asst. U.S. Atty., for the U.S. John J. Hurley, Alexandria, Va., for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge. This case is before the Court on the Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of Sentence. On January 4, 1974, the Defendant pleaded guilty to having illegally used the mails for the importation of marijuana (hashish) in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) and 952(a). The offense in this case consisted of his having sent

  11. Section 2255 - Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence

    28 U.S.C. § 2255   Cited 132,633 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Adopting one-year limitations period for §2255 motions

  12. Section 841 - Prohibited acts A

    21 U.S.C. § 841   Cited 94,216 times   148 Legal Analyses
    In § 841 prosecutions, then, it is the fact that the doctor issued an unauthorized prescription that renders his or her conduct wrongful, not the fact of the dispensation itself.

  13. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 43,278 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

  14. Section 2 - Principals

    18 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 24,424 times   59 Legal Analyses
    Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law

  15. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,720 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  16. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable