In the Matter of E

30 Cited authorities

Glasser v. U.S.
315 U.S. 60 (1942) Cited 7,035 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a jury verdict must be sustained "if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it"
Lutwak v. United States
344 U.S. 604 (1953) Cited 933 times 3 Legal Analyses
Distinguishing between an actual “agreement to conceal” and “an afterthought by the conspirator for the purpose of covering up”
Jordan v. De George
341 U.S. 223 (1951) Cited 715 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that defrauding the United States of tax on distilled spirits is a serious crime involving moral turpitude
Hagner v. United States
285 U.S. 427 (1932) Cited 976 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that an indictment can be upheld if "the necessary facts appear in any form, or by fair construction can be found within the terms of the indictment"
Fiswick v. United States
329 U.S. 211 (1946) Cited 402 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding the petitioner's challenge of his conviction is not rendered moot by the expiration of the underlying sentence because collateral consequences flowing from the conviction give the petitioner "a substantial stake in the judgment of conviction which survives the satisfaction of the sentence imposed on him"
Williamson v. United States
207 U.S. 425 (1908) Cited 365 times 2 Legal Analyses
Rejecting Representative's argument that criminal arrest would deprive him of the constitutional right to attend sessions of Congress, with a historical discussion thereof
Haas v. Henkel
216 U.S. 462 (1910) Cited 222 times
In Haas v. Henkel, 216 U.S. 462 (1910), the Court, dealing with the predecessor to § 371, rejected the argument that there could be no conspiracy to defraud in the absence of contemplated monetary or property loss.
United States v. Klein
247 F.2d 908 (2d Cir. 1957) Cited 147 times 1 Legal Analyses
In United States v. Klein, 247 F.2d 908, 916 (2d Cir.1957), the defendants were charged with tax evasion and a “defraud conspiracy” in connection with their whiskey selling business.
Travis v. United States
269 F.2d 928 (10th Cir. 1959) Cited 33 times
In Travis v. United States, supra, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit said of the membership instruction, precisely like the one here, that "The instructions were meaningful and clear.
United States v. Lutwak
195 F.2d 748 (7th Cir. 1952) Cited 38 times
In Lutwak, several United States citizens entered into sham marriages with foreign citizens in Paris, France, for purposes of allowing the foreign citizens to come to the United States.
Section 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
18 U.S.C. § 371 Cited 21,893 times 143 Legal Analyses
Requiring proof of an "act to effect the object of the conspiracy"
Section 159 - Representatives and elections
29 U.S.C. § 159 Cited 2,441 times 12 Legal Analyses
Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it
Section 1251 - Transferred
8 U.S.C. § 1251 Cited 2,159 times 1 Legal Analyses
Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

In the Matter of E

30 Cited authorities

Holding that a jury verdict must be sustained "if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it"

Distinguishing between an actual “agreement to conceal” and “an afterthought by the conspirator for the purpose of covering up”

Holding that defrauding the United States of tax on distilled spirits is a serious crime involving moral turpitude

Holding that an indictment can be upheld if "the necessary facts appear in any form, or by fair construction can be found within the terms of the indictment"

Rejecting Representative's argument that criminal arrest would deprive him of the constitutional right to attend sessions of Congress, with a historical discussion thereof

In Haas v. Henkel, 216 U.S. 462 (1910), the Court, dealing with the predecessor to § 371, rejected the argument that there could be no conspiracy to defraud in the absence of contemplated monetary or property loss.

In United States v. Klein, 247 F.2d 908, 916 (2d Cir.1957), the defendants were charged with tax evasion and a “defraud conspiracy” in connection with their whiskey selling business.

In Travis v. United States, supra, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit said of the membership instruction, precisely like the one here, that "The instructions were meaningful and clear.

In Lutwak, several United States citizens entered into sham marriages with foreign citizens in Paris, France, for purposes of allowing the foreign citizens to come to the United States.

Requiring proof of an "act to effect the object of the conspiracy"

Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it

Delineating crimes that make alien deportable