§
In the Matter of Diaz

6 Cited authorities

  1. Rosenberg v. Fleuti

    374 U.S. 449 (1963)   Cited 241 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that lawful permanent residents who travel abroad should be admitted, even if otherwise inadmissible, if their travel was "brief, casual, or innocent"

  2. Saxbe v. Bustos

    419 U.S. 65 (1974)   Cited 64 times
    Holding that daily and seasonal alien commuters qualify as immigrant aliens rather than as nonimmigrant aliens

  3. Reid v. INS

    420 U.S. 619 (1975)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that alien who falsely represented himself to be a citizen is deportable as one who has entered without inspection because he "significantly frustrated the process for inspecting incoming aliens"

  4. Maldonado-Sandoval v. U.S. I. N. Serv

    518 F.2d 278 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 17 times
    In Maldonado-Sandoval, we held that the resident alien's two or three day trip to Mexico was an "innocent, casual, and brief excursion,'" and "did not manifest `an intent to depart in a manner which can be regarded as meaningfully interruptive of the alien's permanent residence.'"

  5. Castro-Guerrero v. Immigration Nat. Serv

    515 F.2d 615 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 8 times
    In Castro-Guerrero v. INS, 515 F.2d 615 (5th Cir. 1965) this court interpreted Reid to require that § 1182(a)(20) (invalid visa) could not be a ground that would allow the use of the forgiveness section.

  6. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,912 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"