§

IN THE MATTER OF DE LUCLA

11 I&N Dec. 565 (B.I.A. 1966)
IN THE MATTER OF DE LUCLA

23 Cited authorities

  1. Marcello v. Bonds

    349 U.S. 302 (1955)   Cited 254 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it does not violate due process to have an adjudicator who is "subject to the supervision and control of officials in the Immigration Service charged with investigative and prosecuting functions"

  2. Shaughnessy v. Accardi

    349 U.S. 280 (1955)   Cited 34 times
    Reversing the Second Circuit's finding of improper influence because "speculation on the effect of subconscious psychological pressures [does not] provide sufficient justification for rejecting the District Court's findings" that "the Board's decisions represented the free and undictated decision of each member"

  3. Kimm v. Rosenberg

    363 U.S. 405 (1960)   Cited 19 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 139. Argued May 16-17, 1960. Decided June 13, 1960. Petitioner, an alien whose deportation had been ordered, applied under § 19(c) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended, for an order suspending his deportation or permitting his voluntary departure. In an administrative hearing on his application, he was asked whether he was a member of the Communist Party. He refused to answer, claiming the Fifth Amendment privilege

  4. United States v. Shaughnessy

    206 F.2d 392 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 41 times
    Interpreting § 243(h) of the Act, see note 5 supra

  5. Diminich v. Esperdy

    299 F.2d 244 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times
    Noting “full agree[ment]” with Dunat's holding on economic persecution

  6. United States v. Anastasio

    226 F.2d 912 (3d Cir. 1955)   Cited 17 times

    No. 11350. Argued December 20, 1954. Decided September 19, 1955. Rehearing Denied November 16, 1955. Samuel Paige, New York City (James N. Pappas, Newark, N.J., Paige Paige, Norma Z. Paige, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant. Charles H. Hoens, Jr., Newark, N.J. (Raymond Del Tufo, Jr., U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee. Before GOODRICH and KALODNER, Circuit Judges, and LORD, District Judge. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN

  7. Patsis v. Immigration Naturalization Service

    337 F.2d 733 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times

    No. 17316. October 29, 1964. Albert J. Yonke, Kansas City, Mo., made argument for petitioner and filed brief. Don Bennett, Atty., Immigration Naturalization Dept., Washington, D.C., made argument for respondent and filed brief with Kenneth C. Shelver, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. and Richard D. FitzGibbon, U.S. Atty., and Grove G. Sweet, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo. Before VOGEL, MATTHES and BLACKMUN, Circuit Judges. BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge. Athanasios Patsis petitions for review

  8. United States v. Holton

    248 F.2d 737 (7th Cir. 1957)   Cited 13 times

    No. 11972. October 2, 1957. Rehearing Denied December 4, 1957. Protagoras D. Maktos, Chicago, Ill., for appellant. Robert Tieken, U.S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., John H. Bickley, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for appellee. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, and FINNEGAN and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Chief Judge. Petitioner, detained under a writ of deportation, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court. The writ was

  9. DE LUCIA v. FLAGG

    297 F.2d 58 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 9 times
    In De Lucia, an alien deportation case, the respondent had, among other things, been convicted in Italy of voluntary homicide.

  10. Lu v. Rogers

    164 F. Supp. 320 (D.D.C. 1958)   Cited 12 times
    In Lu v. Rogers, 164 F. Supp. 320, 321 (D.D.C. 1958), aff'd 262 F.2d 471 (D.C. Cir. 1958), the court concluded that 8 U.S.C. § 1253(a) "require[d] a determination that the country to which the alien is to be sent is willing to accept him" and that such determination "must be made prior to the time of the deportation.

  11. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 42,713 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

  12. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,418 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  13. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,760 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  14. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  15. Section 1253 - Penalties related to removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1253   Cited 1,124 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Establishing an exception to withholding for a dangerous alien who has been convicted of a "particularly serious crime," defined to include an "aggravated felony"

  16. Section 1259 - Record of admission for permanent residence in the case of certain aliens who entered the United States prior to January 1, 1972

    8 U.S.C. § 1259   Cited 85 times

    A record of lawful admission for permanent residence may, in the discretion of the Attorney General and under such regulations as he may prescribe, be made in the case of any alien, as of the date of the approval of his application or, if entry occurred prior to July 1, 1924, as of the date of such entry, if no such record is otherwise available and such alien shall satisfy the Attorney General that he is not inadmissible under section 1182(a)(3)(E) of this title or under section 1182(a) of this

  17. Section 287.4 - Subpoena

    8 C.F.R. § 287.4   Cited 16 times
    Authorizing IJ to request that the United States District Court issue an order requiring a recalcitrant witness to comply with an immigration court subpoena

  18. Section 249.1 - Waiver of inadmissibility

    8 C.F.R. § 249.1   Cited 4 times

    In conjunction with an application under section 249 of the Act, an otherwise eligible alien who is inadmissible under paragraph (9), (10), or (12) of section 212(a) of the Act or so much of paragraph (23) of section 212(a) of the Act as relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marihuana may request a waiver of such ground of inadmissibility under section 212(h) of the Act. Any alien within the classes described in subparagraphs (B) through (H) of section 212(a)(28)