§

In the Matter of Dabiran

13 I&N Dec. 587 (B.I.A. 1970)
In the Matter of Dabiran

7 Cited authorities

  1. Rosenberg v. Fleuti

    374 U.S. 449 (1963)   Cited 240 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that lawful permanent residents who travel abroad should be admitted, even if otherwise inadmissible, if their travel was "brief, casual, or innocent"

  2. Leng May Ma v. Barber

    357 U.S. 185 (1958)   Cited 209 times
    Holding that an alien's parole into the United States "did not alter her status as an excluded alien"

  3. Rogers v. Quan

    357 U.S. 193 (1958)   Cited 11 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 396. Argued May 20, 1958. Decided June 16, 1958. Respondents, natives of China, came to the United States between 1949 and 1954, seeking admission. All were paroled in the United States but have been ordered excluded. They applied for stays of deportation under § 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, on the ground that their deportation to China would subject them to physical persecution at the hands

  4. SIU FUNG LUK v. ROSENBERG

    409 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 23 times
    In Luk v. Rosenberg (9 Cir. 1969), 409 F.2d 555, we held that although it might be more convenient for the alien to process his new application for admission while in the United States, the District Director's denial of a stay was not an abuse of discretion.

  5. Klapholz v. Esperdy

    201 F. Supp. 294 (S.D.N.Y. 1961)   Cited 7 times
    In Klapholz v. Esperdy, 201 F. Supp. 294 (S.D.N.Y. 1961), the alien applied for admission on shipboard on July 30, 1956, and was served with Form I-122 on August 2, 1956.

  6. Klapholz v. Esperdy

    302 F.2d 928 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 5 times

    No. 324, Docket 27399. Argued April 26, 1962. Decided May 18, 1962. Jackson G. Cook, New York City (Stuart Wadler, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant. Roy Babitt, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for the S.D. of New York, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a summary judgment which dismissed a complaint seeking review of an exclusion order

  7. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,711 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"