§

In the Matter of D---- W---- O

5 I&N Dec. 351 (B.I.A. 1954)
In the Matter of D---- W---- O

18 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Di Re

    332 U.S. 581 (1948)   Cited 1,252 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law determines the validity of a warrantless arrest for a violation of federal law "in absence of an applicable federal statute"

  2. Maggio v. Zeitz

    333 U.S. 56 (1948)   Cited 541 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the primary condition of [turnover] relief is possession of existing chattels or their proceeds capable of being surrendered by the person ordered to do so"

  3. Beach v. Beach

    114 F.2d 479 (D.C. Cir. 1940)   Cited 46 times
    In Beach, supra, a divorce proceeding on the grounds of adultery in which maintenance for the child was requested, the court ordered blood grouping tests of the husband, wife and child to aid in determining paternity.

  4. Ly Shew v. Acheson

    110 F. Supp. 50 (N.D. Cal. 1953)   Cited 18 times
    In Ly Shew v. Acheson, D.C., 110 F. Supp. 50, the trial court held that the burden upon such a claimant was heavier than the regular burden.

  5. State v. Damm

    62 S.D. 123 (S.D. 1933)   Cited 36 times
    Applying the abuse of discretion standard during the review of a trial courts decision to clear spectators from the courtroom during the testimony of a 13-year-old victim of second degree rape

  6. Saks v. Saks

    189 Misc. 667 (N.Y. Dom. Rel. Ct. 1947)   Cited 19 times

    July 18, 1947. Herman Brothers for petitioner. Edward V. Whiting for respondent. PANKEN, J. The problem presented in this proceeding is the determination of the paternity of the child, Karl Bernard. The testimony reveals that the parties were married on or about February 21, 1943. The child, Karl Bernard, was born to the petitioner on or about May 6, 1943, some ten or eleven weeks after the marriage ceremony. A child born in wedlock, whether it was conceived before or after the marriage ceremony

  7. United States v. Shaughnessy

    116 F. Supp. 745 (S.D.N.Y. 1953)   Cited 9 times

    December 11, 1953. Joseph J. Davidson, New York City (John C. Delaney, New York City, of counsel), for relators. J. Edward Lumbard, U.S. Atty. for the Southern Dist. of N.Y., New York City (Philip M. Drake, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Rochelle, N. Y., and Lester M. Friedman, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. MURPHY, District Judge. The issues in this case arise from a writ of habeas corpus issued by one of the judges of this district on September 14, 1953

  8. Mar Gong v. McGranery

    109 F. Supp. 821 (S.D. Cal. 1952)   Cited 9 times

    No. 13803. December 15, 1952. J. Edward Keating, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff. Walter S. Binns, U.S. Atty., Clyde C. Downing, Robert K. Grean, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant. WESTOVER, District Judge. This is an action filed under Section 503 of the United States Nationality Act, Title 8 U.S.C.A. § 903, by which plaintiff seeks judgment and decree of this court, declaring that he is a national of the United States of America. The case at bar is only one of many filed by Chinese

  9. United States v. Shaughnessy

    115 F. Supp. 302 (S.D.N.Y. 1953)   Cited 6 times

    September 17, 1953. Hong Gim, New York City, Benny Gim, New York City, of counsel, for relators. J. Edward Lumbard, U.S. Atty., New York City, Harold R. Tyler, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Max Blau, Attorney, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York City, of counsel, for respondent. DIMOCK, District Judge. The three relators in this habeas corpus proceeding are natives of China who claim United States citizenship by virtue of the United States citizenship of the man whom they allege to be their

  10. Lew Mun Way v. Acheson

    110 F. Supp. 64 (S.D. Cal. 1953)   Cited 4 times

    110 F.Supp. 64 (S.D.Cal. 1953) LEW MUN WAY v. ACHESON, Secretary of State. No. 13614. United States District Court, S.D. California. Feb. 2, 1953 Benjamin W. Henderson, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff. Walter S. Binns, U.S. Atty., Clyde C. Downing, Asst. U.S. Atty. and Arline Martin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant. WESTOVER, District Judge. Lew Mun Way filed this action pursuant to Section 903, Title 8, U.S.C.A., for a judgment declaring him to be a national of the United States

  11. Section 249 - Medical care and treatment of quarantined and detained persons

    42 U.S.C. § 249   Cited 28 times

    (a) Persons entitled to treatment Any person when detained in accordance with quarantine laws, or, at the request of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, any person detained by that Service, may be treated and cared for by the Public Health Service. (b) Temporary treatment in emergency cases Persons not entitled to treatment and care at institutions, hospitals, and stations of the Service may, in accordance with regulations of the Surgeon General, be admitted thereto for temporary treatment

  12. Section 1224 - Designation of ports of entry for aliens arriving by aircraft

    8 U.S.C. § 1224   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses

    The Attorney General is authorized (1) by regulation to designate as ports of entry for aliens arriving by aircraft any of the ports of entry for civil aircraft designated as such in accordance with law; (2) by regulation to provide such reasonable requirements for aircraft in civil air navigation with respect to giving notice of intention to land in advance of landing, or notice of landing, as shall be deemed necessary for purposes of administration and enforcement of this chapter; and (3) by regulation

  13. Section 252 - Medical examination of aliens

    42 U.S.C. § 252   Cited 16 times
    Authorizing promulgation of regulations regarding medical examinations of aliens

  14. Section 34.1 - Applicability

    42 C.F.R. § 34.1   Cited 4 times
    Providing that requirements regarding medical examinations apply to applicants for adjustment of status