§

In the Matter of Coelho

20 I&N Dec. 464 (B.I.A. 1992)
In the Matter of Coelho

18 Cited authorities

  1. Taylor v. Illinois

    484 U.S. 400 (1988)   Cited 2,283 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the trial court's exclusion of a witness whose name was untimely disclosed to the government didn't violate the defendant's right to a complete defense

  2. INS v. Doherty

    502 U.S. 314 (1992)   Cited 1,107 times
    Holding that a regulation with the same formulation established a necessary but not sufficient condition

  3. INS v. Abudu

    485 U.S. 94 (1988)   Cited 1,170 times
    Holding that the BIA may deny a motion to reopen if "the movant has not established a prima facie case for the underlying substantive relief sought"

  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang

    450 U.S. 139 (1981)   Cited 298 times
    Holding that where allegations are "unsupported by affidavit" they cannot support a motion to reopen because this would constitute a circumvention of the affidavit requirement in the regulations

  5. INS v. Phinpathya

    464 U.S. 183 (1984)   Cited 245 times
    Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning

  6. INS v. Rios-Pineda

    471 U.S. 444 (1985)   Cited 187 times
    Holding that the BIA may discount evidence of seven years' presence in its assessment of eligibility for suspension when presence was maintained through meritless appeals

  7. Francis v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    532 F.2d 268 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 249 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "fundamental fairness" dictates that § 212(c) apply to resident aliens in deportation as well as exclusion proceedings

  8. Lok v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    681 F.2d 107 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 56 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Supreme Court ruled that an alien did not have to be a permanent resident to harbor a lawful intent to remain. Thousands of aliens could become lawful domiciliaries without becoming permanent residents under Elkins."

  9. Yousif v. I.N.S.

    794 F.2d 236 (6th Cir. 1986)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that motions to reconsider cannot be granted except upon a "prima facie showing that the statutory requirements for the underlying relief have been met"

  10. Bahramnia v. United States I.N.S.

    782 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1986)   Cited 13 times
    In Bahramnia, an Iranian supporter of the deposed Shah claimed fear of persecution by the Khomeini regime if returned to Iran.

  11. Section 841 - Prohibited acts A

    21 U.S.C. § 841   Cited 90,654 times   145 Legal Analyses
    In § 841 prosecutions, then, it is the fact that the doctor issued an unauthorized prescription that renders his or her conduct wrongful, not the fact of the dispensation itself.

  12. Section 2 - Principals

    18 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 23,718 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law

  13. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,703 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  14. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  15. Section 2106 - Determination

    28 U.S.C. § 2106   Cited 1,576 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Granting appellate courts authority to "direct the entry of ... judgment ... as may be just under the circumstances"

  16. Section 103.5 - Reopening or reconsideration

    8 C.F.R. § 103.5   Cited 208 times
    Authorizing officers to exercise their discretion to excuse untimely filing of motion to reopen or reconsider where movant demonstrates that delay was reasonable and beyond the movant's control