Upholding jury instruction and noting that instruction stated proper test for intent to injure or defraud as "whether or not the bank was defrauded of something, defrauded of its right to have custody of [its] funds, the right of the bank to make its own decisions as to how these funds were to be used, and to act under other regulations promulgated in protection of banking"
Stating that while malice and want of probable cause are both essential elements of false arrest and malicious prosecution, "malice may be inferred from want of probable cause"