IN THE MATTER OF CENATICE, ET AL

5 Cited authorities

  1. Kleindienst v. Mandel

    408 U.S. 753 (1972)   Cited 769 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that students had a "constitutional interest" in hearing a Marxist theoretician speak at academic conferences and discussions in the United States
  2. Pierre v. United States

    547 F.2d 1281 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 26 times
    Rejecting the contention of unadmitted Haitian aliens seeking parole "that the Protocol invests them with a liberty right protectable by due process or other constitutional protections," and noting "the intent of Congress in acceding to the Protocol to leave existing immigration procedures intact"
  3. Sannon v. United States

    427 F. Supp. 1270 (S.D. Fla. 1977)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that Protocol established aliens' right to a hearing
  4. United States v. Murff

    176 F. Supp. 253 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that alien paroled and released on bond pending exclusion proceedings was "still, in theory of law, ‘on the threshold of initial entry.’ " (quoting Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei , 345 U.S. 206, 212, 73 S.Ct. 625, 97 L.Ed. 956 (1953) )
  5. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,708 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"